Favourites
Most popular topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Time to get tough with Ir... (41)
- smoking ban.... hmmm?... (33)
- Police try to shut down n... (31)
- Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza... (25)
- HAPPY NEWS!!!!... (22)
- THE LIE OF THE CENTURY... (21)
- Paying for Palestinian Gu... (21)
- Britain takes case agains... (20)
- NEW ZEALAND... (18)
- Bill Gates: Satanist in S... (17)
- Moore sued by US Soldier... (15)
- Controversial anti-Rape D... (15)
- Mosques' women policy cri... (13)
- Please take a look at thi... (13)
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ... (12)
- UK bank details sold in N... (11)
- US sets possible Time tab... (11)
- Human Rights...who needs ... (11)
- Why Do People Mock Scient... (10)
- Robin Williams... (9)
- Global warming - a load o... (9)
- hardcore jobless face los... (9)
- Why is Britain a broken C... (9)
- Missile in Google maps... (8)
- What are you all doing to... (8)
Latest topics | World-issuesopen/close
- E-Cigarettes and the Smok...
- Middle East flaring up?...
- (UK) Reduce petrol petit...
- Falklands oil debate...
- Griffin at it again!!!...
- Gary McKinnon...
- Dating overseas from the ...
- Why is Britain a broken C...
- Far-Right Politics...
- tesco, unionist bigotry a...
- Abolish interest-rates? W...
- National bankruptcy...
- Pulling the plug...
- oh my god plane crash in ...
- Aftermath of the Peace Pr...
- London Anti-War Protests... 8524
- Why Nigeria?...
- Is Karen Matthews a case ...
- hardcore jobless face los... 8527
- Should welfare recipients... 8527
- this is sickening!!!...
- Loony left council wants ...
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ...
- Palin is spoofed by fake ...
- Athiests bus ads...
Home >> World-issues >> Time to get tough with Iran
19.02.2007, 07:55 quote
Alleged terrorists in Guantanamo, until they are released - maybe.
Here having a breath of fresh air in the yard before it's time for lunch.
19.02.2007, 12:38 quote
Bush also won't see any trial.....although he should be taken to Den Hague.
The problem: The USA is one of the few countries who refused to sign the contract...so the USA can commit war crimes without that anything happens....
And starting a war is illegal - it is only allowed to protect yourself or to help other countries that are invaded....starting a war itself is a crime and George Bush is a criminal.
20.02.2007, 11:43 quote
I understand that US went to war over being attacked back in 2001 - to save face. However, focus shifted rapidly from Bin laden in Afghanistan to Oil in Iraq. And cleaning up their old Middle East messes.
Most unfortunately for the Arabs cleaning means killing everyone.
On FBI's most wanted list it's not even claimed Bin Laden has anything to do with WTC. http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
The clandestine U.S. commandos whose job is to capture or kill Osama bin Laden have not received a credible lead in more than two years.
03.03.2007, 15:40 quote
Aradon wrote: |
lmao SC, the US are a VERY aggresive nation, they are so busy trying to police the entire world and tbh, it's not their f*cking job |
04.03.2007, 15:16 quote
well why havent they bombed london, or havent you bothered to read the o'loan report, which clearly states that many people were killed by terrorists, working for, and in the payroll of the british state...or is it a case of your terrorism good, my terrorism bad
have a look at this stoney http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4552241204719421053
stonecastle wrote: | ||
|
04.03.2007, 17:18 quote
hey lads, play the ball...
DrBrightside wrote: | ||||
Dude, what is your problem? Why don't you tell me why you have a problem with what I'm saying? |
04.03.2007, 19:37 quote
francy wrote: |
well why havent they bombed london. |
05.03.2007, 23:11 quote
i'v noticed this is a touchy subject that no one wants to join in with, i think their wise not to.
05.03.2007, 23:13 quote
thats politics....lol...
brightfame wrote: |
i'v noticed this is a touchy subject that no one wants to join in with, i think their wise not to. |
05.03.2007, 23:35 quote
I think i'll leave this one alone, you know what i'm like! so i wont bother giving you my views, but you seem like a very articulate, intelligent sort of guy who's able to get there point across precisly without offence to the other person, i hope you find a soloution to the problem, of a hopless cause which is terrorism. but i think your wasting your breath sorry
ChiefOHara wrote: | ||
Politics generally tends to be, but you have to remember some people enjoy the arguments and the debates. one positive thing about debating politics is that it either helps you to refine your viewpoint or realise your mistakes in it. I wouldn't post in this area if i didn't enjoy it. |
06.03.2007, 15:33 quote
ChiefOHara wrote: |
Also the Invasion of Iraq has nothing to do with Terrorism and everything to do with Halliburton. There were no WMD's, there was no immenient threat. |
07.03.2007, 01:41 quote
Just send in Chuck Norris, he'll sort everything out with a few well aimed roundhouse kicks.
07.03.2007, 10:45 quote
chuck is an old man now, all theyd need to do is kick away his zimmer frame and he'd be marry'd
07.03.2007, 20:20 quote
ChiefOHara wrote: |
the moral thing would work with me, except for the fact that no one is invading Mugabe's mess of a nation enmass, and when Liberia pleaded for US intervention they were ignored. There are plenty of tinpot dictators in the world. |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum