Iran has for years being supplying Islamic terrorist groups with weapons including Shia militias in Iraq smuggling many tons of weapons across the border into that country. It has also refused at every point to stop its nuclear programme and is now only months away from being able to produce an atomic bomb.

It is time the world community got tough and stood up to this bandit state and demanded it stop immediatly supplying terroists with weapons and halted its nuclear programme or face very serious consequences such as invasion by a massive UN or NATO force to achieve those aims of disarmament and ending the supply of weapons to terrorists,

er...the british establishment have been supplying british terrorists with weapons etc for years in the north of ireland

http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0122/mccordr.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6286325.stm

the british also supplied saddam husseins regime...do you think we should bomb british cities too??

get a grip, stonecastle...war is not the answer...

I hate it when people become victim of propaganda and even spread it further amongst other people.

Them dates from memory?

If so I might be able to advise you on your topic of discussion on dates.

youre a bit premature implying that these conflicts are settled, america has a long way to go yet...if youre so gung ho about war, why dont you enlist in the armed forces?

OK I will comment on Korea and Vietnam. In Korea America joined on the side of South Korea to protect that country from invasion by communist North Korea. Given the dreadful state of North Korea I think their decision was right. North Korea is a backward, impoverished dictatorship while South Korea is a prosperous democracy.

In Vietnam a similar thing happened. America intervened to defend a democracy, South Vietnam from invasion by a communist dictatorship. Sadly it lost. The result was horrific for the South Vietnamese who suffered terror, torture and imprisonment by the conquering North Vietnamese communists. Do you not remember the Vietnam boat people? One million refugees fled Vietnam after the victory by the communist Vietcong.

There is no insight into how US treats prisoner of war. - Sorry they have been renamed enemy combatants and as such are not entitled to legal representation or a civil trial, subjects neither to the Geneva Conventions nor to the purview of the US civilian court system.

Guantanamo, located on Cuban territory, it is the legal equivalent of outer space, unlike military bases on US territories. These other locations were ruled out as prison sites because they fall under the jurisdiction of the often-liberal Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals.

In essence, they don't exist as human beings or legal, human entities.
Someones brother or father is whisked away across the globe, has a secret trial and a secret sentence. Diplock courts anyone? US was contemplating Camp X-ray death chambers, I don't know if they went though with it.

Since Human Rights organisations have been refused access to detainees we don't know how they are being treated. The only example of an American prisoner camp we have is Abu Ghraib and frankly, the Pentagon acknowledges that 25 men have died while in the hands of US forces. Now that reports has become public, the US Army has revealed investigations into some of its findings, including charges that Iraqi inmates were sodomized by soldiers.

Ok...now I know what you mean by "US aggression"...I though you were worrying about"people becoming aggressive against the USA"