Favourites
Most popular topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Police try to shut down n... (114)
- Time to get tough with Ir... (86)
- Why is Britain a broken C... (56)
- THE LIE OF THE CENTURY... (54)
- Controversial anti-Rape D... (50)
- smoking ban.... hmmm?... (47)
- hardcore jobless face los... (47)
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ... (46)
- London Anti-War Protests... (38)
- NEW ZEALAND... (37)
- Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza... (37)
- HAPPY NEWS!!!!... (35)
- Britain takes case agains... (34)
- 9/11 - An Inside Job... (34)
- Athiests bus ads... (34)
- Should welfare recipients... (34)
- US sets possible Time tab... (33)
- Ever heard anything so ST... (33)
- Far-Right Politics... (33)
- Why Do People Mock Scient... (32)
- Vat down to 15% means 2.1... (31)
- this is sickening!!!... (31)
- Moore sued by US Soldier... (30)
- We were lied to about 9/1... (30)
- Is Karen Matthews a case ... (30)
Latest topics | World-issuesopen/close
- I need an oriental guy!! ...
- Griffin at it again!!!...
- Haiti Earthquake Measure ...
- kelly suicide verdict bei...
- March election now lookin...
- Gary McKinnon...
- Why I may appear to be a ...
- Dating overseas from the ...
- Why is Britain a broken C...
- Far-Right Politics...
- tesco, unionist bigotry a...
- Calling musicians...
- RBS WANT DAMAGES FI G2O P...
- SWINE FLU...
- Innocent man dies after p...
- Abolish interest-rates? W...
- Christian Bus Ads...
- The USA has 10 700 000 00...
- National bankruptcy...
- Britian "Bored but H...
- The internet and CO2...
- "Pax Obama" in ...
- Pulling the plug...
- Gaza will not go down......
- oh my god plane crash in ...
Home >> World-issues >> Time to get tough with Iran
12.02.2007, 16:32 quote
Iran has for years being supplying Islamic terrorist groups with weapons including Shia militias in Iraq smuggling many tons of weapons across the border into that country. It has also refused at every point to stop its nuclear programme and is now only months away from being able to produce an atomic bomb.
It is time the world community got tough and stood up to this bandit state and demanded it stop immediatly supplying terroists with weapons and halted its nuclear programme or face very serious consequences such as invasion by a massive UN or NATO force to achieve those aims of disarmament and ending the supply of weapons to terrorists,
12.02.2007, 16:50 quote
er...the british establishment have been supplying british terrorists with weapons etc for years in the north of ireland
http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0122/mccordr.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6286325.stm
the british also supplied saddam husseins regime...do you think we should bomb british cities too??
get a grip, stonecastle...war is not the answer...
15.02.2007, 23:44 quote
| stonecastle wrote: |
| Iran has for years being supplying Islamic terrorist groups with weapons including Shia militias in Iraq smuggling many tons of weapons across the border into that country. It has also refused at every point to stop its nuclear programme and is now only months away from being able to produce an atomic bomb.
It is time the world community got tough and stood up to this bandit state and demanded it stop immediatly supplying terroists with weapons and halted its nuclear programme or face very serious consequences such as invasion by a massive UN or NATO force to achieve those aims of disarmament and ending the supply of weapons to terrorists, |
I hate wars, I'am going to admit i wanted to go to war at first with Iraq. I didn't think Bush brought a strong enough case to determine if they had weapons of mass destruction but on the other hand Iraq def harboured terrorist groups one group responsible for blowing up the side of the USS Cove. The big reason why Iraq is faling; The groups inside Iraq and the countries surrounding Iraq do not want to see democracy win, nor by a western country.
Imagine if we never went to war with Iraq?? The London bombing may have never occured. The Iraq war also contributed to the rise in anti western countries and their allies.
16.02.2007, 03:44 quote
| stonecastle wrote: |
| USA has for years being supplying various terrorist groups with weapons including Shia militias in Iraq smuggling many tons of weapons across the border into that country. It has also refused at every point to stop its nuclear programme and is the only country ever to use atomic bombs, and then two at the same time.
It is time the world community got tough and stood up to this bandit state and demanded it stop immediatly supplying terroists with weapons and halted its nuclear programme or face very serious consequences such as invasion by a massive UN or NATO force to achieve those aims of disarmament and ending the supply of weapons to terrorists, |
16.02.2007, 07:28 quote
I hate it when people become victim of propaganda and even spread it further amongst other people.
| Quote: |
| Iran has for years being supplying Islamic terrorist groups with weapons including Shia militias in Iraq smuggling many tons of weapons across the border into that country.
|
"Iran" is a county....so it sounds like there was an official law or government programme where terrorists can apply for a sponsorship for weapsons.
How ridiculous.
Have you ever been to Iran?
Maybe you should go there on a holiday trip and look at the country - I doubt you would have the same opinion after that....
Most people have the wrong impression of it.
You might as well say "It is time to get tough on the USA - they own nuclear weapons".
16.02.2007, 07:39 quote
| stonecastle wrote: |
| I agree, stop US aggression! |
What about stop aggression in general?
I dont think US aggression is worse then Iran aggression.
Apart from that I think pollution and global warming is far more serious then terrorism. Terrorism is only a potential and sporadic danger whereas pollution is a definite long-term danger that will kill us all.
And if you loook at Iraq, the USA have done more damage now through starting a pointless war, then those terrorists would ever have been able to achieve in their whole life.
16.02.2007, 07:56 quote
I think US agression is far more worrying, you only need to look at how many carriers they have, any nation that has one is considered a considerable military force, britain for example have like 2/3, US have 12/13 active all over the world. Their military power and capabilities is quite shocking and when you think who is in control of it i believe everyone has to be a little bit worried.
_________________
Please read the forum guidelines before you post
16.02.2007, 08:04 quote
| Aradon wrote: |
| I think US agression is far more worrying, you only need to look at how many carriers they have, any nation that has one is considered a considerable military force, britain for example have like 2/3, US have 12/13 active all over the world. Their military power and capabilities is quite shocking and when you think who is in control of it i believe everyone has to be a little bit worried. |
16.02.2007, 15:05 quote
| Aradon wrote: |
| I think US agression is far more worrying. |
World War I when they sent troops to Europe to defeat Germany.
World War II when they not only sent troops to Europe but loaned Britain military hardware.
1988 Panama when America acted to arrest Panamanian president Noriega for being involved in drugs smuggling.
The 1991 Gulf War when America led a massive international coalition to liberate Kuwait.
1993, Somalia when American troops died in the Black Hawk Down incident trying to arrest a major warlord inorder to save that country from civil war.
1999, Kosovo when America together with other NATO countries intervened to stop ethnic cleanising of Kosovo Albanians by Serbia.
2001, when America and its allies overthrew the brutal regime of the Taliban and destroyed Al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks.
2003, when America and its allies overthrew the most brutal regime of modern times that of Saddam Hussein responsible for hundreds of thousands of murders and ethnic persecution of the kurds which saw two million Kurds flee their homeland as refugees.
16.02.2007, 16:54 quote
Them dates from memory?
If so I might be able to advise you on your topic of discussion on dates.
16.02.2007, 23:15 quote
| stonecastle wrote: | ||
World War I when they sent troops to Europe to defeat Germany. World War II when they not only sent troops to Europe but loaned Britain military hardware. 1988 Panama when America acted to arrest Panamanian president Noriega for being involved in drugs smuggling. The 1991 Gulf War when America led a massive international coalition to liberate Kuwait. 1993, Somalia when American troops died in the Black Hawk Down incident trying to arrest a major warlord inorder to save that country from civil war. 1999, Kosovo when America together with other NATO countries intervened to stop ethnic cleanising of Kosovo Albanians by Serbia. 2001, when America and its allies overthrew the brutal regime of the Taliban and destroyed Al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. 2003, when America and its allies overthrew the most brutal regime of modern times that of Saddam Hussein responsible for hundreds of thousands of murders and ethnic persecution of the kurds which saw two million Kurds flee their homeland as refugees. |
Ohhhhhh stonge-age you really must not believe everything Hollywood tells you!!!
16.02.2007, 23:18 quote
youre a bit premature implying that these conflicts are settled, america has a long way to go yet...if youre so gung ho about war, why dont you enlist in the armed forces?
| stonecastle wrote: |
|
2001, when America and its allies overthrew the brutal regime of the Taliban and destroyed Al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. 2003, when America and its allies overthrew the most brutal regime of modern times that of Saddam Hussein responsible for hundreds of thousands of murders and ethnic persecution of the kurds which saw two million Kurds flee their homeland as refugees. |
17.02.2007, 02:02 quote
StoneCastle you left out two pretty infamous wars, Korea, and Vietnam. In both wars the States got involved because it was fighting the soviet Union by proxy. At the very least Vietnam was screwed up because the US backed a tyrant in the South who paid enough lip service to democracy to satisfy them.
I also remember the American Invasion of canada soon after the American war of Independence. Ye kicked them out of it pretty quickly.
As for the case of war being made by Iran...... well ..... what can i say, but remember the BS surrounding the WMD's, also more importantly if the global war on terror is so important to the security of the world, why has Osama Bin laden been forgotten about?
17.02.2007, 20:41 quote
OK I will comment on Korea and Vietnam. In Korea America joined on the side of South Korea to protect that country from invasion by communist North Korea. Given the dreadful state of North Korea I think their decision was right. North Korea is a backward, impoverished dictatorship while South Korea is a prosperous democracy.
In Vietnam a similar thing happened. America intervened to defend a democracy, South Vietnam from invasion by a communist dictatorship. Sadly it lost. The result was horrific for the South Vietnamese who suffered terror, torture and imprisonment by the conquering North Vietnamese communists. Do you not remember the Vietnam boat people? One million refugees fled Vietnam after the victory by the communist Vietcong.
18.02.2007, 00:18 quote
Your right in everything except that south vietnam wasn't a democracy. The leader was an anti- soviet ally, nothing more. In that case the US backed the wrong horse.
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


