Posts: 436765 Topics: 21976 LOGIN

Favourites

 

Home >> World-issues >> Far-Right Politics

14.08.2009, 11:09 quote

numbeuphoria

Ahem, I'm starting to tire of berating people for their appearance. Such things are only happening, I realise, because there is a distinct lack of meaningful or even remotely stimulating subject matter cropping up on these forums. I'm lashing out due to frustration =)

So, I'd like to get a bit of a gauge of people's views. Especially if they're leaning to the right. EXPOSE YOURSELVES, VERMIN.

I could call myself a social anarchist and base this on a philosophy of existentialism and collective autonomy. Capitalist society, in my opinion, is not condusive with very fundamental aspects of human 'nature' (I use the term loosely) or social functionality. Although I have to concur it is a necessary economic process in evolutionary terms - I wish more people would realise their political and social positions and speed up the process!

I do not believe there are 'good' and 'bad' people - Peter Connolly's mother is not 'evil', she is a passive victim of circumstance - guilty of little more ignorance to her own sorry existence than most professionals I've met.

I believe one of the biggest problem our society faces at the moment is a rampant and savage desire to criminalise memebers of society. Specifically the ones without a hope of defending themselves, nor to break out of whatever cycle they've got into. Drug addicts are prepared to do things to their own bodies that most of us would throw up at - does this not tell people something about the fragility of these people? Can you imagine how emotionally stunted you would have to be put a knife in someone's neck without even thinking about it? These people aren't enjoying their lives, clearly, so why do people who are comparatively well off feel so venomous towards lowlives? It baffles me, I need light to be shed on this matter.

Yet what has seemed to be the most pertinent political issue so far this year? MPs expenses? How predictable the media and public are - totally ruled by jealousy and greed, just like the fuckers who got the second homes.

Perhaps if society's focus was on having a meaningful and focused education leading on to a CAREER suited to each individual rather than earning money and reaching targets, we would get out of the cyclone of the last thirty or so years. Think about it - put all that money we put into silly defense strategies and criminalising the underclass into better training and more teachers and specialising the last three years of secondary education to career based programmes. CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE. People have the capacity to be given choices! Early on! The solutuions seem very simple to me - I think government is incredibly lazy and completely self motivated.

I've tried to be fairly provokative. I cant see myself getting many takers...

 

14.08.2009, 14:09 quote

joey2cards

I agree with you mostly, and we need people who are passionate about society's flaws so that we can evolve... but really... you want to flag these ideas up on a site called Flirtbox?? Really?

Also, you don't believe in good or bad people, but you do believe that some of us are vermin? Haha

As for careers... I think the system is actually flexible enough to allow people to chase their dreams. The problem is that people aren't geared up to think in the way of careers... they usually have no idea until they leave uni!

Check the poem 'My Town' by Buddy Wakefield. You might like it
http://www.myspace.com/buddywakefield

 

14.08.2009, 14:19 quote

zacktelstar
zacktelstar Joined: 15 Feb 2009 Posts: 878 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Edinburgh
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Quote:
The problem is that people aren't geared up to think in the way of careers... they usually have no idea until they leave uni!


...now there's a generalisation, joey.
_________________
"The tighter you grasp Lord Vader, the more it will slip through your fingers."

 

14.08.2009, 14:20 quote

joey2cards

zacktelstar wrote:
Quote:
The problem is that people aren't geared up to think in the way of careers... they usually have no idea until they leave uni!


...now there's a generalisation, joey.


Nothing wrong with the odd generalisation as long as it doesn't harm anyone!

 

14.08.2009, 19:41 quote

ridgers
ridgers Joined: 10 Aug 2009 Posts: 10 Location: United Kingdom, England, Berkshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Hmm... when I first joined i didn't expect a post like this here but it looks interesting, so why not? first off, let me start by saying... commie!

Nah, just kidding; it's good to see someone who knows the proper Marxist ideals. Anyway, given what's happened with our economy recently your argument has a very good point. I mean, one American bank goes down the tube and the rest are to afraid to trade with each other? and to compound the fact that wall street is really nothing more than a big gambling den in a way... Confused

Can a person be born good or bad? probably not as you said. Their can be quite a number of things that can 'make' a person like that I would guess. They way they grew up, their role models, repression of feelings, their can be a very long list. Although, ignoring what those thugs did to her child is more than enough of a crime if you ask me... However, I do know that a person genetics may not help in this matter; the Plantagenets were quite well known for going insane or having terrible tempers.

ah, your next point I don't quite agree on; while some drug addicts are more than willing to ruin their own bodies like you some however, are pretty much forced into that position by the addictiveness of the drug. Hell, i've even heard cases of drug dealers mixing in some really addictive drugs into people's drinks and they slowly get addicted to the drug over time against without even knowing it. And while I have never been on drugs myself I can say that it would not be a simple task to kick the habit. After a while the only thing that matters is giving yourself that high, it's not the person mind but the drug.

Why do people from the upper class hate lower class people? because it makes them feel better, that's why. People from the upper class were always like, always have been and probably always will be. although, I don't know if it's completely there fault, a lot o them were brought up to be like that.

Well, as I've been able to avoid paying any taxes so far I can't really comment on that apart from it is pretty funny that one MP got caught using that money to pay for a duck house and another to pay to clean his moat.

your last argument is just wishful thinking in a way; they have to want to learn in the first place, a lot of these people don't really want to, it's much easier to continue their regular patterns than dig themselves. besides, what good would a system like that do us now? there's not enough jobs for all of the British people here, not including all the immigrants here. And the government is lazy, self centered, greedy and complete utter bastards that live in their own little fantasy worlds.

and Joey... she was being sarcastic about the bit involving vermin. Wink

 

14.08.2009, 22:36 quote

tzazo
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 290 Location: United Kingdom, England, Dorset
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Quote:
Capitalist society, in my opinion, is not condusive with very fundamental aspects of human 'nature' (I use the term loosely) or socialfunctionality.

How remarkable, and quite possibly true.

Quote:
Although I have to concur it is a necessary economic process in evolutionary terms - I wish more people would realise their political
and social positions and speed up the process!

Oh dear! and you where doing so well to start with.
Philosophical and political ideologies are all built uppon flawed models of human society. Those models are only useful within limited areas, apply them beyond their scope of competance and they fall down creating misery and suffering. The greater the domain of human life they are applied to beyond that scope of competance the lest humane they are and the less human humans are forced to be.

However people desire power, over themselves and over others, for some power over others is power over themselves. Self abusers are gaining power over themselves by their acts of abuse, often for them they feel it is the only means to gain some control.

MPs expenses however was a valid thing to expose and deal with, a flaw in the system that needs correction.

Quote:
Perhaps if society's focus was on having a meaningful and focused education leading on to a CAREER suited to each individual rather than earning money and reaching targets, we would get out of the cyclone of the last thirty or so years.


That needs more descriptiont to make sense.

 

14.08.2009, 22:57 quote

jackdav

I started typing a really long and involved serious post about social responsibility, but I stopped and deleted it as I cbfa.

 

15.08.2009, 03:21 quote

numbeuphoria

joey2cards wrote:
but really... you want to flag these ideas up on a site called Flirtbox?? Really?


I totally thought this was being flirtatious.

joey2cards wrote:
Also, you don't believe in good or bad people, but you do believe that some of us are vermin? Haha


Good and Bad are terms (religious ones) used to judge so called innate traits within THE SOUL of a human being. Mine's a harmless little metaphor =) I only judge opinions and beauty. Ha.


tzazo wrote:

Philosophical and political ideologies are all built uppon flawed models of human society.


Oh dear - to be honest I only put any labels on my beliefs because I knew at the very least someone would want to argue a semantic point. 'Social anarchist' and 'existentialist' are terms I can use to refer to the literature from which I've ascertained any knowledge I have. I'm not refering to past hashed attempts at forcing social change - I'm not some romantic revolutonary trotskyite. If you'll notice, I tried to make it clear that I do not believe in 'applying social models' but rather progressive change through the determinable economic process. You've gotten all caught up in words I used as mere reference points for all you academics out there! You trailed off towards the end of that paragraph.. stuff about domain and humane and the word human a lot.

As for the power thing - bullshit, don't be so cynical. People primarily crave love and acceptance from family and peers; it is when something goes amiss here that asserting percieved authority or power (over the self or others) becomes a defense mechanism for an individual. The capitalist system focuses people on money over love and hence we have a lot of power issues! People crave mad forms of control because are not self-determined beings as they should be, they are greatly held back by meaningless consumer based expectations from society. Mainly just due to an embarrassing lack of knowledge.

Have a look at how the German education system works - it's nowhere near perfect but I can't be bothered right now to describe my model... I'll refer you there for now. It's better.

Ridgers - I'm bored. I'll come to you tomorrow - you had me until that crap about jobs and immigrants. YAWN.

 

15.08.2009, 05:48 quote

rossjackson1985
rossjackson1985 Joined: 08 Feb 2009 Posts: 161 Location: United Kingdom, England, Staffordshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

if any of the proper old school regulars on this site (LV & Ann-marie etc etc) would notice this lass is almost identical to me when it comes to ideas and views etc...appearance wise..she is far better looking... which doesn't come from my mouth that often Razz

watch out flirtbox..there is now two of us Razz

 

15.08.2009, 05:50 quote

rossjackson1985
rossjackson1985 Joined: 08 Feb 2009 Posts: 161 Location: United Kingdom, England, Staffordshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

also, good and bad is made from the human psyche.. it is subjective.

 

15.08.2009, 09:27 quote

handsel
handsel Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 2355 Location: United Kingdom, England, West Midlands
View user's profile Visit poster's website

numbeuphoria wrote:
Ahem, I'm starting to tire of berating people for their appearance. Such things are only happening, I realise, because there is a distinct lack of meaningful or even remotely stimulating subject matter cropping up on these forums. I'm lashing out due to frustration =)

So, I'd like to get a bit of a gauge of people's views. Especially if they're leaning to the right. EXPOSE YOURSELVES, VERMIN.

I could call myself a social anarchist and base this on a philosophy of existentialism and collective autonomy. Capitalist society, in my opinion, is not condusive with very fundamental aspects of human 'nature' (I use the term loosely) or social functionality. Although I have to concur it is a necessary economic process in evolutionary terms - I wish more people would realise their political and social positions and speed up the process!

... (and more and more)...


1st paragraph: 'I'm a baby, with a huge brain and loads of time - and I can't help myself.'

2nd paragraph: Sticking the stick thru the bars.

3rd paragraph: A shitload of impressive sounding words juggled about, but let's take the 1st sentence... 'I could call myself a social anarchist...'
My dear, you could write, 'I could call myself a ferret...' Razz It means nothing.
If you'd said, 'I am a social anarchist ...' It would be clear and mean something.
(Whatever you'd imagined you might have meant by 'social anarchist'! )
'... and base this on a philosophy of existentialism and collective autonomy.'
So you've based calling yourself a 'social anarchist' on a philosophy?
Is this philosophy your philosophy? Or someone elses?
Or some imagined generally accepted philosophy?
And, whatever it is...
Is that a philosophy of existentialism combined with collective autonomy?
Or a combined philosophy of extentialism and collective autonomy?

'Capitalist society, in my opinion, is not condusive with very fundamental aspects of human 'nature' (I use the term loosely) or social functionality. '
'Nature' isn't the only term you're using loosely. You can have 'condusive with', but it's mispelt and should be 'conducive to' - which makes no sense.
So you probably meant 'compatible with'.
You'd have to say what these aspects of human nature are - whether they be 'fundmental' or 'very fundmental'. You'd have to define what you meant by 'social functionality'.

That was far enough (right, left or centre! ) for me
Basically, nobody is going to know what you're writing about...
(Including, I suspect, you! Razz )
And I'm not surprised you had to tout for replies. Twisted Evil
_________________
Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the clubs and the fresh air.
(Jack Benny)

 

15.08.2009, 11:19 quote

tzazo
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 290 Location: United Kingdom, England, Dorset
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Quote:

Oh dear - to be honest I only put any labels on my beliefs because I knew at the very least someone would want to argue a semantic point. 'Social anarchist' and 'existentialist' are terms I can use to refer to the literature from which I've ascertained any knowledge I have. I'm not refering to past hashed attempts at forcing social change - I'm not some romantic revolutonary trotskyite. If you'll notice, I tried to make it clear that I do not believe in 'applying social models' but rather progressive change through the determinable economic process. You've gotten all caught up in words I used as mere reference points for all you academics out there! You trailed off towards the end of that paragraph.. stuff about domain and humane and the word human a lot.


Hardly trailed off, went where you either cannot or will not go. Ironic, but not surprising.

Quote:
As for the power thing - bullshit, don't be so cynical.

Cynicism is an ancient school of philosophy, nothing wrong in it all.

Quote:
People primarily crave love and acceptance from family and peers; it is when something goes amiss here that asserting percieved authority or power (over the self or others) becomes a defense mechanism for an individual.

Plausable.

Quote:
The capitalist system focuses people on money over love and hence we have a lot of power issues!

Captalism?
Econimics happen, it is not a system. Money is a mere arbitary symbol of value.

Quote:
People crave mad forms of control because are not self-determined beings as they should be, they are greatly held back by meaningless consumer based expectations from society. Mainly just due to an embarrassing lack of knowledge.

No. Though it might be plausable to say they are forced into ideological systems of thought, that being inhuman produce such results.
Your beef seems to be consumerism I note not capitalism.

Quote:
Have a look at how the German education system works - it's nowhere near perfect but I can't be bothered right now to describe my model... I'll refer you there for now. It's better.

Unlikely, and not worth the bother.

 

15.08.2009, 12:43 quote

numbeuphoria

handsel wrote:
1st paragraph: 'I'm a baby, with a huge brain and loads of time - and I can't help myself.'


This gets best put down of the thread. Made me laugh out loud old codger!

I think you highlight your own flaws more than mine with that reply though. Like Tzazo, you've had to focus mainly on the semantics of my argument (like the one spelling mistake I make! Goes to show how much I care, I guess.) Also - you seem to be pandering your reply to a public perception, or perhaps trying to shape a less able minded posters view on my writing!

I am certainly not one of these 'throw big words together blindly' types who just spurts a load of meaningless gobshite. I have used those terms as REFERENCE POINTS - I don't want to have to make this point again. If anyone's ever picked up a fucking book in their life - those terms would point you to thinkers such as Nietzche, Chomsky, Dostoevsky, Sartre, Ostergaard and obviously Marx. I've used those terms instead of long winded definitions because I'm not as intelligent as the afrementioned people. IF THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU. Yeah? I didn't use them to be impressive - I'm not sure why I'd be compelled to do that.

Here though - just so you don't think my words are like a completely empty shell. I'll define social anarchism:
Anarchism itself is the belief that a society should exist without a state/government. A lot of people are quite scared by this notion, but if you step back and look at it FROM A PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWPOINT, you see that life and people are defined largely by circumstance. If you presuppose everyone needs looking after like a bunch of ugly overgrown babies, well... -Social- anarchism places special focus upon the importance of looking after eachother! It suggests an anti-Thatcher type hatred for individualism and private ownership etc.

There's what 'I thought I meant' by social anarchism. Hope it's simple enough.

 

15.08.2009, 14:21 quote

sc0ttie

I wish Greystone would come back

 

15.08.2009, 14:29 quote

tzazo
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 290 Location: United Kingdom, England, Dorset
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Quote:
If anyone's ever picked up a fucking book in their life - those terms would point you to thinkers such as Nietzche, Chomsky, Dostoevsky, Sartre, Ostergaard and obviously Marx.


Oh dear, is that all you read?
Marx was wrong, Nietzche is dubious thanks to the interference of his sister on his writings and I can't be bothered to even consider the others at the mo'.

Quote:
I've used those terms instead of long winded definitions because I'm not as intelligent as the afrementioned people.

False modesty.


Quote:
Here though - just so you don't think my words are like a completely empty shell. I'll define social anarchism:
Anarchism itself is the belief that a society should exist without a state/government. A lot of people are quite scared by this notion, but if you step back and look at it FROM A PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWPOINT, you see that life and people are defined largely by circumstance. If you presuppose everyone needs looking after like a bunch of ugly overgrown babies, well... -Social- anarchism places special focus upon the importance of looking after eachother! It suggests an anti-Thatcher type hatred for individualism and private ownership etc.

There's what 'I thought I meant' by social anarchism. Hope it's simple enough.


State and government have several roots, but the one that permits their survival is that they are the modern formalised products of tribal society.

Do you hate induviduals? How perverse!
Private ownership is inevitable, starting with the induviduals ownership of themselves and induvidualism is necessary for the collective.
Humans are not one, and are not many, they are both.

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum