Favourites
Most popular topics | Dating open/close
- What would you do with th... (12345)
- Crush? Wanna know if you'... (9167)
- Is there any men out ther... (681)
- Sexy Accents... (561)
- Can women really go for g... (379)
- tell us who you want to d... (345)
- the fuller figured woman.... (294)
- Approaching people you li... (282)
- How do you impress a girl... (240)
- Do guys mind... (218)
- ****ing men!... (198)
- Asian being a turn off ?... (197)
- Tattoos?... (195)
- Intelligence a barrier?... (191)
- Is it wrong for a woman t... (188)
- Is height an issue?... (184)
- Too brainy for FB?... (172)
- Have you met anyone from ... (170)
- hello all i'm looking for... (169)
- THE rate the person's pro... (167)
- Disgusting Messages from ... (161)
- The Marriage opener / pic... (156)
- Confidence boost?... (155)
- Age gap..maybe?... (155)
- NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT IT... (154)
Latest topics | Dating open/close
- Lokkin for fun girl...
- Looking for a cougar in T...
- Seeking Italian girl for ...
- Visiting Brisbane...
- Looking for a decent woma...
- Looking for Woman in Hapm...
- Looking for woman Hapmshi...
- looking for a hot girl...
- skype fun girls...
- hi girls only...
- Hay im danny want to find...
- Big, strong man wanted...
- i need a woman...
- 3some Hull...
- Newcastle couple...
- girl in north east englan...
- male or female fun...
- Bri 16 from Texas loping ...
- sex in PA?...
- C o c kmad women...
- Find love on the web...
- Too all women....
- No Strings Attached fun w...
- Looking for a male or fem...
- daytimesex...
Home >> Dating >> Flirtbox Romances?
07.08.2007, 05:54 quote
| darkhorse58 wrote: | ||
Slightly off-topic (but it is my thread hehe), but sorry, that 'distance thing' reason is usually a cop-out reason. If someone really wants it to work, distance means diddly squat, and if the distance is really a problem, one of the people could move - if they want that relationship badly enough. I have never met anyone who used the distance reason honestly, there was always something else as the main reason for not sustaining a long distance relationship. Having said that, I suppose it depends what kind of relationship someone is looking for, or what status they give the relationship they are in. |
Can't say I really agree with what your saying here. I went out with a girl that was living in Switzerland only for a year then she was coming back to England. But it basicly adds all kinds of pressure to a relationship before it has even started. It's all well and good saying that it should be a factor but that isnt realistic. And by the way it doesnt just apply to being in another country lol.
Problem is say two people get on and things go well then obviously at some point or another they are going to want things to be stepped up so to speak. So you may say? Well if you live at opposite ends of the country for example a 6 hour drive or even 4 hour train journey isnt as easy as you would think especially if your doing that every week. And as for moving......Well if you think that is something easy to do then your must be a travelling hermit.
There are other obvious smaller aspects as well its hard to be shall we say more spontaneous and romantic you cant exactly do so many things spur of the moment. Here's another one if you have an arguement over the phone not like it's really easy to just go round to him/hers and make up.
I'm not trying to make this all into a doom and glume scenario just wanted to say I think there might be people here that can pick up and travel etc and maybe not find it too much hassle. But on the whole I think a long distance thing DOES add problems but thats just my 2 pence.
Anyway good luck to you all and take care.
07.08.2007, 07:11 quote
Hello Gav, welcome to the forums. I would certainly hope that you disagree with some of my points, we would be boring people if everyone agreed on everyhting! You have very valid points of course, and some of them were discussed elsewhere on the forum some time ago – that’s one of the problems, some of the older posts get lost under a pile of new ones, and then we forget that newer members are not aware of other members views on things, and then we (or I, in this case) post something new without clarifying exactly what I mean, assuming that everyone knows what I meant and read between the lines.
I said “Having said that, I suppose it depends what kind of relationship someone is looking for, or what status they give the relationship they are in.” above – this covers a lot of ground. For example, surely it would unrealistic to attempt anything more than a casual ldr – even if exclusive - (or step up to another level) if one knows in advance that one is probably not going to be able to move, and also that the person that they are seeing will be unable to move, for whatever reasons (personal or financial circumstances, tied geographically (job, kids at school).
I’m under the impression that a long distance relationship will only work if the 2 people involved do NOT want to live with someone else full time (includes at any point in the future unless one of them is prepared to move), have their own lives to get on with when the other is away, do not want anyone on top of them 24/7, do not want to talk to each other on the phone for hours every day, and happy to continue seeing their significant other on an ‘as & when we’re free’ basis. 2 people with ties (especially their jobs or even more importantly, kids still at school) should know that a ldr is out of the question and from a practical point of view should either be looking for someone closer to home or decide what status they want to give a ldr so that it does work (i.e. ‘as & when free’).
Falling in love is a funny old thing, you never know who you will fall in love with, or where they will be living
But, knowing that one can’t move away from where they live, they still allow themselves to ‘fall in love’ with someone who lives hours away and then try to step things up a bit further down the line.
Condensed, a LDR only works if a) one person is able to move when things step up or b) the status of the relationship is a comfortable ‘as & when free’ for both parties, without a desire for the spontaneity and benefits of a ‘normal’ relationship.
I know what I say will not apply to everyone, but I do hope that anyone considering a ldr will take the time to evaluate the pros and cons and not let their heart run away with them and make promises to another in the heat of the moment that they can’t keep.
My own current ‘as & when free’ ldr is one where the ground rules have been laid out on both sides, as to what will and won’t happen further down the line (I learnt a lot from my last ldr lol). Ironically, despite those ground rules and a mutually agreed status to the ldr, I am actually luckily to be self-employed and work from home, so in reality I would make a perfect candidate for a ldr that might develop into something more. Ain’t life a funny old thing?
/* Me (being my usual crude self!) still think that most ldr’s are sexually orientated
*/
07.08.2007, 07:59 quote
| darkhorse58 wrote: |
| Hello Gav, welcome to the forums. I would certainly hope that you disagree with some of my points, we would be boring people if everyone agreed on everyhting! You have very valid points of course, and some of them were discussed elsewhere on the forum some time ago – that’s one of the problems, some of the older posts get lost under a pile of new ones, and then we forget that newer members are not aware of other members views on things, and then we (or I, in this case) post something new without clarifying exactly what I mean, assuming that everyone knows what I meant and read between the lines.
I said “Having said that, I suppose it depends what kind of relationship someone is looking for, or what status they give the relationship they are in.” above – this covers a lot of ground. For example, surely it would unrealistic to attempt anything more than a casual ldr – even if exclusive - (or step up to another level) if one knows in advance that one is probably not going to be able to move, and also that the person that they are seeing will be unable to move, for whatever reasons (personal or financial circumstances, tied geographically (job, kids at school). I’m under the impression that a long distance relationship will only work if the 2 people involved do NOT want to live with someone else full time (includes at any point in the future unless one of them is prepared to move), have their own lives to get on with when the other is away, do not want anyone on top of them 24/7, do not want to talk to each other on the phone for hours every day, and happy to continue seeing their significant other on an ‘as & when we’re free’ basis. 2 people with ties (especially their jobs or even more importantly, kids still at school) should know that a ldr is out of the question and from a practical point of view should either be looking for someone closer to home or decide what status they want to give a ldr so that it does work (i.e. ‘as & when free’). Falling in love is a funny old thing, you never know who you will fall in love with, or where they will be living Condensed, a LDR only works if a) one person is able to move when things step up or b) the status of the relationship is a comfortable ‘as & when free’ for both parties, without a desire for the spontaneity and benefits of a ‘normal’ relationship. I know what I say will not apply to everyone, but I do hope that anyone considering a ldr will take the time to evaluate the pros and cons and not let their heart run away with them and make promises to another in the heat of the moment that they can’t keep. My own current ‘as & when free’ ldr is one where the ground rules have been laid out on both sides, as to what will and won’t happen further down the line (I learnt a lot from my last ldr lol). Ironically, despite those ground rules and a mutually agreed status to the ldr, I am actually luckily to be self-employed and work from home, so in reality I would make a perfect candidate for a ldr that might develop into something more. Ain’t life a funny old thing? /* Me (being my usual crude self!) still think that most ldr’s are sexually orientated
*/ |
Seems I miss out on all the fun.
07.08.2007, 15:37 quote
| darkhorse58 wrote: |
| 2 people with ties (especially their jobs or even more importantly, kids still at school) should know that a ldr is out of the question and from a practical point of view should either be looking for someone closer to home or decide what status they want to give a ldr so that it does work (i.e. ‘as & when free’).
Falling in love is a funny old thing, you never know who you will fall in love with, or where they will be living */ |
Ah well, thats me out of the running for a relationship on here then. Might as well pack up the old laptop now and head down the bingo.
07.08.2007, 18:18 quote
I collect TLRs so I'd like to thank you dark horse for a new one. Never heard, though have had, a LDR, and yes, I tend to agree with what you said. It failed cos one wanted a serious relationship and the other did too, but only one thought it possible 100 miles apart.
Unless you count the greek girl I met in france when I was a student and went out to greece to see, and then we lost touch cos I couldn't be arsed to get on the magic bus again. But that folks, is another story i won't bore you with.
Oh, I already have. Sorry.
09.08.2007, 11:35 quote
I am simply too ugly to get dates. I've been on dating sites since early 2001 but have yet to have any proper success. All that has happened is that I have met up with a couple of women for an initial meeting but they haven't got back in contact for a second meeting.
09.08.2007, 11:48 quote
| Greystone wrote: |
| I am simply too ugly to get dates. I've been on dating sites since early 2001 but have yet to have any proper success. All that has happened is that I have met up with a couple of women for an initial meeting but they haven't got back in contact for a second meeting. |
Babe i do hope for your own sake that this is a wind up ??????? Because if its not, its not a very good move to advertise the fact on a dating site about previous failures. I met a guy once who talked all evening about how all his previous dates never contacted him and talked really negatively about himself alnight. Just a little piece, if you cant love yourself then no one else will ........... xx
09.08.2007, 12:53 quote
| annmarie5988 wrote: |
| if you cant love yourself then no one else will ........... xx |
I don't think that's entirely true.
Someone else lurvin you isn't based only on that. If someone lurves you, you can talk and feel shaite bout yourself for ages, their lurve won't change. I'm speakin out of experience, of course.
09.08.2007, 13:25 quote
| Bliss23 wrote: | ||
I don't think that's entirely true.
Someone else lurvin you isn't based only on that. If someone lurves you, you can talk and feel shaite bout yourself for ages, their lurve won't change. I'm speakin out of experience, of course. |
Sorry Bliss I hate to disagree (since you might hurt me!)
But on the whole I would have to say I totally agree with Annemarie. People that have a low self-esteem and that basicly dont love themselves find it very hard to meet people. For starters these kinds of people tend to feel doomed to failure before entering into anything.
Basicly I think its very hard to love someone who sees themselves as worthless of course there are exceptions and it depends on how low a regard you had for yourself at the time Bliss.
But when you feel that no one could love you or that you might be ugly etc then it is kind of like asking for it to be that way. Men/Women pick up on it.
09.08.2007, 13:55 quote
me and craigybits! we have been best mates forever but have decided to give it a go and so far so good! we see each other every weekend so we still both have our own space during the week and we are so happy! good luck to the rest of you
09.08.2007, 14:02 quote
| Bliss23 wrote: |
Oukeyyyyyy... ![]() |
No Bliss put down the hammer........arrrrggggghhhhhhhh.........
09.08.2007, 14:17 quote
| bonbon3 wrote: |
| me and craigybits! we have been best mates forever but have decided to give it a go and so far so good! we see each other every weekend so we still both have our own space during the week and we are so happy! good luck to the rest of you |
Great news Bonbon.....wondered where you pair had sloped off tooooooo
09.08.2007, 14:45 quote
we are normally happy Caz Unless BonBon is chucking me out of bed at some Ungodly Hour of Morning to make her Breakfast !!!! we even had a wee trip last week lol
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


