Posts: 395317 Topics: 16167 LOGIN

Home >> Dating >> ratios on fb

06.06.2007, 15:45 quote

Anonymous

i've come to the conclusion that due to the ratio factor on fb the chances of getting a date for us blokes is remote.there must be something like 5 guys to everyfemale.another gripe i got is that alot of the profiles on here the people havn,t even logged on for weeks.if you want a date blokes buy a calendar lol

 

06.06.2007, 17:18 quote

Anonymous

Yup. The ratio of men to women is frankly ludicrous.

Dating biased in favour of women? It would certainly seem so. (Else why would so few be signed up?)

 

06.06.2007, 17:33 quote

Anonymous

Hmmmmmm - can't see my inbox chokka full - any other girls?

 

06.06.2007, 17:44 quote

Anonymous

NIGHTWAVE wrote:
i've come to the conclusion that due to the ratio factor on fb the chances of getting a date for us blokes is remote.there must be something like 5 guys to every female.another gripe i got is that a lot of the profiles on here the people haven,t even logged on for weeks.if you want a date blokes buy a calendar lol


Numbers shouldn't make too much difference, though, should they ? Quality and making a decent effort should still be the most important factors, surely ? Even if there were 3 women to every man on here, you'd still be competing with every other male that happens to wonder in and out of their lives in the real world. Besides, a fair few women on these boards are single so it's not like there's no-one to go for or anything. There's certainly not a drought anyway, and what's more there's plenty more women in the world Very Happy.

I can't say I've contemplated the ratio on here, and I wouldn't know what stats to use to do so anyway, so I can't comment any more than that.

 

06.06.2007, 17:56 quote

bikergirl74
bikergirl74 Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 41 Location: United Kingdom, England, Devon
View user's profile Visit poster's website

pollyanna37 wrote:
Hmmmmmm - can't see my inbox chokka full - any other girls?


Nope, nor mine.... I get some sleeze from time to time and it's fairly obvious that they haven't read my profile.

 

06.06.2007, 18:19 quote

elitious
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Glasgow
View user's profile Visit poster's website

so much for cheering me up Twisted Evil

 

06.06.2007, 18:24 quote

Anonymous

Think about it rationally for a second. I'd say, judging by the 'Whos Online' section, that at any one time there is a ratio of anything from 2-to-1 to 3-to-1 in favour of the women. Therefore women can afford to be selective. Now, as the criteria on here seems to reflect real life - ie. primarily based on looks - then if you're average or below your chances are pretty slim in getting a response. Whether you're Casanova or not.

Theres nothing intrinsically wrong with this. It's perfectly natural behaviour under the circumstances, and I'm sure if the roles were reversed then men's attitudes would be identical.

Now, I'm under no illusions about myself. I'd say I was distinctly average. Not too ugly or obnoxious (though who knows, others opinions may vary) and I'd like to think that I can message someone without making a complete twat of myself in the process. But there is a consistent lack of replies. Which I'm presuming (or at least I hope) is because of the wealth of talent on offer.

So for now I've pretty much given up on sending messages out and instead take the attitude of 'Let the mountain come to Mohammed'. If someone takes the initiative then that goes in their favour straight away. If not I'll still be trying my luck in the 'real world' anyway. It's not like it's a race.

 

06.06.2007, 18:30 quote

elitious
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Glasgow
View user's profile Visit poster's website

chikhai wrote:
Think about it rationally for a second. I'd say, judging by the 'Whos Online' section, that at any one time there is a ratio of anything from 2-to-1 to 3-to-1 in favour of the women. Therefore women can afford to be selective. Now, as the criteria on here seems to reflect real life - ie. primarily based on looks - then if you're average or below your chances are pretty slim in getting a response. Whether you're Casanova or not.

Theres nothing intrinsically wrong with this. It's perfectly natural behaviour under the circumstances, and I'm sure if the roles were reversed then men's attitudes would be identical.

Now, I'm under no illusions about myself. I'd say I was distinctly average. Not too ugly or obnoxious (though who knows, others opinions may vary) and I'd like to think that I can message someone without making a complete twat of myself in the process. But there is a consistent lack of replies. Which I'm presuming (or at least I hope) is because of the wealth of talent on offer.

So for now I've pretty much given up on sending messages out and instead take the attitude of 'Let the mountain come to Mohammed'. If someone takes the initiative then that goes in their favour straight away. If not I'll still be trying my luck in the 'real world' anyway. It's not like it's a race.


well said, as myself i have taken the same approach, as there is no point writing something destined for a bin. if some one wants me, come an get me else, i enjoy my freedom Twisted Evil

 

06.06.2007, 18:39 quote

Anonymous

chikhai wrote:
Think about it rationally for a second. I'd say, judging by the 'Whos Online' section, that at any one time there is a ratio of anything from 2-to-1 to 3-to-1 in favour of the women. Therefore women can afford to be selective. Now, as the criteria on here seems to reflect real life - ie. primarily based on looks - then if you're average or below your chances are pretty slim in getting a response. Whether you're Casanova or not.

Theres nothing intrinsically wrong with this. It's perfectly natural behaviour under the circumstances, and I'm sure if the roles were reversed then men's attitudes would be identical.


I don't doubt all of that is relevant, but that's all entirely based upon looks, isn't it ? There's location, too, as well as intelligence & ability to compose a reasonable message. Intelligence doesn't even mean you have to be smart, it could mean you're too smart for some of the women. It can also just mean being on the same wavelength as the person you're messaging. Women, from what those on here have said, also seem not to do too much messaging first.

There's so many angles and factors that I don't think it's worth worrying about. I've never really been bothered by statistical analysis of things like this anyway. I just happily message anyone who seems interesting so long as they've been on fairly recently.

 

06.06.2007, 18:43 quote

elitious
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Glasgow
View user's profile Visit poster's website

maybe we should forum a mens union and go on strike!!!. NO MORE MSG UNTIL WE GET SOME REPONSE

 

06.06.2007, 20:21 quote

Anonymous

You are right - the chances of male members with profiles without pictures are remote to find a date....you need to have a proper picture of yourself.

Of course, there are more men then women! So there is competition and men need to make an effort to find a date! It takse time and creativity to get replies....and an interesting profile with good pictures. I have dated a couple of girl from Flirtbox, and it was worth the effort - I would never have met them otherwise.

The only way to achieve a 1:1 ratio on a dating site, is to artificially reduce the number of male profiles (e.g. by membership fees) - but this would be bad for the women - women on Flirtbox should have a big choice. A lot of men are on here only by accident and would never ever pay for a dating site. I also think most women do not want to date men who spend money on a dating site as they are desperate, but rather men who just joined for fun initially....

Once women find out that cool guys are more likely to be on Flirtbox then on a "premium dating site" for desperate men with money, they will spread the word and in the long term the number of female profiles will also increase.....but then even more men come to the website and in the end there will always be more men - as in real life when it comes to dating. Women never need to pull...they only need to wait for the right one to pull them. Just observe an attractive woman in a night club.....often they just stand around .... guys come up to them and try to flirt with them....in 99% of all cases they will say "no thanks"....so women basically just wait for "the right one".....whereas men actively need to search for the right one.

 

06.06.2007, 20:29 quote

elitious
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 1264 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Glasgow
View user's profile Visit poster's website

god wrote:
Of course, there are more men then women! So there is competition and men need to make an effort to find a date! It takse time and creativity to get replies....and an interesting profile with good pictures. I have dated a couple of girl from Flirtbox, and it was worth the effort - I would never have met them otherwise.

The only way to achieve a 1:1 ratio on a dating site, is to artificially reduce the number of male profiles (e.g. by membership fees) - but this would be bad for the women - women on Flirtbox should have a big choice. A lot of men are on here only by accident and would never ever pay for a dating site. I also think most women do not want to date men who spend money on a dating site as they are desperate, but rather men who just joined for fun initially....

Once women find out that cool guys are more likely to be on Flirtbox then on a "premium dating site" for desperate men with money, they will spread the word and in the long term the number of female profiles will also increase.....but then even more men come to the website and in the end there will always be more men - as in real life when it comes to dating. Women never need to pull...they only need to wait for the right one to pull them. Just observe an attractive woman in a night club.....often they just stand around .... guys come up to them and try to flirt with them....in 99% of all cases they will say "no thanks"....so women basically just wait for "the right one".....whereas men actively need to search for the right one.


not completely agree. the options are limited due to ratio

 

06.06.2007, 20:35 quote

Anonymous

How many dates have you had then? I can not imagine you have not dated a woman from Flirtbox yet - unless you have only joined recently or you do something wrong - or you have only messaged 3 women.

The ratio is just the way it is. I do not see any point in artificially trying to reduce the number of male profiles in order to have an even ratio or to try and fake the statistics.

There are always more men then women on dating sites usually....if it is a "natural" representation.....it is always harder for men to find a woman then the other way round...therefore also more men use the internet to find a date then women.

 

07.06.2007, 07:58 quote

Anonymous

We may have more to choose from, but when every 2nd/3rd message is making sexual propositions, it kind of lowers the ratio somewhat!!

I had one yesterday from a 26 year old. Admittedly his forth rightness and absolute honesty were refreshing, but it still doesn't detrect from the fact he didn't stand a chance with a message like that!

 

07.06.2007, 08:43 quote

Daspikey
Daspikey Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 361 Location: United Kingdom, England, Hampshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

giggidy giggidey just take your damned knickers off..
haha

To be honest I prefer just chatting on the forums and messaging the women who are talking on here as generally they are reasonable ladies that will talk back even if they dont fancy me..
its light entertainment stop putting so much pressure on trying to "pull" one of the women here but instead get to know them and maybe something might blossom. shrugs..
Dont get me wrong I do get the odd moment when I just send troll messages out to every woman just to see if I get a response.. and for that I apologise im a weak weak man *hangs head in shame*

I could be completely wrong..

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum