Here are some very strange findings regarding the paper-fate of the four aircraft that went "missing" on 9/11. The following info is copied directly from www.planecrashinfo.com <http://www.planecrashinfo.com>. You're free to verify the data yourself if you want to do the homework. I did...


11 Sep 2001 New York City, New York

United Air Lines
Boeing B-767-222
N612UA 65/65
11 Sep 2001 New York City, New York

American Airlines
Boeing 767-223ER
N334AA 92/92
11 Sep 2001 Arlington, Virginia.

American Airlines
Boeing B-757-223
N644AA 64/64
11 Sep 2001 Shanksville, Pennsylvania

United Air Lines
Boeing B-757-222
N591UA 44/44

It shows the four flights of 9/11, including tail numbers and crash information on the links. The information below is copied directly from the Federal Aviation Administration's N-number registry <http://registry.faa.gov/>

The first plane listed is American Airlines Flight 11, tail number N334AA,
which crashed into the WTC North Tower. Note reason for cancellation, and
cancel date.

FAA Registry
N-Number Inquiry Results

---------------------------------

N334AA is Deregistered

Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1

Aircraft Description
Serial Number 22332 Type Registration
Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date
01/06/2000 Model 767-223 Mode S Code 50722254 Year
Manufacturer 1987 Cancel Date 01/14/2002 Reason for
Cancellation Destroyed Exported To

Next is American Flight 77, tail number N644AA, which hit the Pentagon.
Please note the same details, reason for cancellation and cancellation date.

FAA Registry
N-Number Inquiry Results

---------------------------------

N644AA is Deregistered

Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1

Aircraft Description
Serial Number 24602 Type Registration
Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date
05/08/1991 Model 757-223 Mode S Code 52072030 Year
Manufacturer 1991 Cancel Date 01/14/2002 Reason for
Cancellation Destroyed Exported To

Next is United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, which hit the South Tower
of the WTC. Please note the same details.

Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1

Aircraft Description
Serial Number 21873 Type Registration
Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date
01/18/1984 Model 767-222 Mode S Code 51773757 Year
Manufacturer 1983 Cancel Date 09/28/2005 Reason for
Cancellation Cancelled Exported To

Hmmm. What? Cancelled registration on 9/28/05? Not destroyed and
deregisterd in early 2002? What about the last flight, United Flight 93,
tail number N591UA, the one that allegedly crashed near Shanksville,
Pennsylvania.

Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1

Aircraft Description
Serial Number 28142 Type Registration
Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date
07/01/1996 Model 757-222 Mode S Code 51721341 Year
Manufacturer 1996 Cancel Date 09/28/2005 Reason for
Cancellation Cancelled Exported To

Huh? Cancelled? On the same date in 2005? Not destroyed and cancelled
in early 2002?

How can American Airlines flights show the planes destroyed and the registration cancelled, while both United flights show the planes as simply being cancelled without explanation 4 years after they allegedly were destroyed? Why?

What the heck is going on here? These are public records, accessible by everyone until their purge date is reached. That is Nov. 11, 2006 for both United flights. There is no purge date listed for the two American Airlines flights.

Why would a company keep two aircraft that had been destroyed on its active lineup for four years, and then simply list the registration as "Cancelled"?
Even the most ardent coincidence theorist is going to have to think hard to come up with some rationale for this one.

Please pass this information on to anyone that you think might be able to use it.


more......... http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=90306

Thinking too deeply about anything remotely 'werstern' in terms of politics and government could drive anyone crazy...

It's just a shame that it's always the innocent civilians that don't make any of the worldly decisions that lose their lives.

Every conspiracy theorist will agree that its all done for money. So keeping 2 airplanes for a few years longer than they have existed for might suggest that they were in the company inventry for a few years, giving the company a few 10's of millions dollars more assets. Makes them more valuable - can get bank loans and things easier.... Just a thought.

Or can look at it the other way, the planes never crashed in the first place and were in service untill 2005.

We'll just never know.

have you written to any one official to ask about this
_________________
Hey I'm new, talk to me

Which one?
The airlines trying to defraud the banks for loans or that the planes never crashed in the first place, and the pentagon was hit by a missile not a plane?

reading some more on this i'd say "The airlines trying to defraud the banks for loans " is most likly
_________________
Hey I'm new, talk to me

Apart from keeping the asset on their books it probably took that long for the insurance to pay up then they would remove.

No conspiracy here i think.

Don't think like some Saudis I know who are convinced Israli missiles hit the towers just before the planes and can prove it.

Frankly I think your all bonkers.

Exactly who's job do you think it is to de-register aircraft after they've been destroyed by Arab Terrorists?

Somehow I suspect the people at United don't know and didn't bother to think about it having bigger things on their minds and continued not to think about it until somebody did an assets audit.

You see conspiracy. I see beuracracy.

Maybe the sceptics amongst you should have a look at this http://www.911revisited.com/
_________________
Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without one.

I won't have a battle of wits with an unarmed man.

is this is enough?





GC

LOL
_________________
Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without one.