Favourites
Most popular topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Police try to shut down n... (114)
- Time to get tough with Ir... (86)
- THE LIE OF THE CENTURY... (54)
- Controversial anti-Rape D... (50)
- smoking ban.... hmmm?... (47)
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ... (44)
- NEW ZEALAND... (37)
- Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza... (37)
- HAPPY NEWS!!!!... (35)
- Athiests bus ads... (34)
- Britain takes case agains... (34)
- 9/11 - An Inside Job... (34)
- US sets possible Time tab... (33)
- Why Do People Mock Scient... (32)
- Moore sued by US Soldier... (30)
- this is sickening!!!... (29)
- Are you prepared to be ja... (28)
- Global warming - a load o... (25)
- Bill Gates: Satanist in S... (24)
- Paying for Palestinian Gu... (24)
- Human Rights...who needs ... (23)
- Vat down to 15% means 2.1... (23)
- The USA "world polic... (22)
- The costs of the Iraq war... (21)
- Ever heard anything so ST... (20)
Latest topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Should welfare recipients...
- this is sickening!!!...
- Vat down to 15% means 2.1...
- Loony left council wants ...
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ...
- Palin is spoofed by fake ...
- Are you prepared to be ja...
- Athiests bus ads...
- Passports will be needed ...
- Local Ways to beat the Cr...
- The worlds gone mad...
- 14th October UFO Confirma...
- My backyard becomming the...
- Wall Street rescue deal b...
- Conspiracy Theories...
- Swedish woman goes mental...
- Benny Cash...
- We were lied to about 9/1...
- Prisoners to work on buil...
- I know I shouldn't worry...
- Georgia at war?...
- Obama - what's your opini...
- Never take a laptop with ...
- anyone been to afghanista...
- Please take a look at thi...
Home >> World-issues >> THE LIE OF THE CENTURY
10.10.2006, 19:11 quote
| mig29 wrote: |
| the arms industry NEEDS war! there's megabucks in war
if there were total World peace the economy of most western countries (especially the USA) would be severly hit. |
You know, that reminds me of Kinky Sex Makes The World Go Round
Any guesses of the year ?
11.10.2006, 23:16 quote
I do find it amusing to hear how people hate america so much. It's almost pathalogical, in the same way that people hate and begrudge successful and wealthy individuals.
Don't get me wrong, the yanks have some serious problems and screw up a fair bit, but at the end of the day, they are certainly the lesser evil of all of the other alternative super powers (with the exception of Europe if it ever gets it's act together).
America is basicly facing the same hostility that every successful empire has faced since time immemorial:
Persian empire, carthage, rome, the british empire et al, all face the same problem. Everybody envied them and spited them. Human nature.
In a hundred years time it will be China everybody will be bitching about.
Governments are there to seek the best interests of their states and people, period, so why do we all look so surprised when they play dirty to succeed? If our ancestors played fair we would all be slaves of some other great power, thats a FACT.
Think about it, in my case, I live on an island that is basicly good for grazing sheep and not much else. It only has minimal natural resources and yet it is a prosperous, safe and wealthy country, while there are places in Africa and Asia which are bursting with natural resources, yet are for want of a better word "holes".
How could we possibly be living in such comfort under a "fair" system or through ethical trading policies? SO if we were to make everything fair, we would be basicly living in mud huts wearing sheep skins...
So we are all a bit guilty of treading on the third world, we are all profiting from americas success. I'm not saying it's fair, but I'm not going to be a hypocrite and blame america for all the worlds ills.
The day America stops acting in its own interest, is the day America starts to decline.
Man I went on a bit there,... sorry guys. I like my history.
12.10.2006, 07:20 quote
I thing Sarge 55 has put the quote of Sun TZU totally out of context.
If you want to see what he really did say check out
http://www.chinapage.com/sunzi-e.html
18.10.2006, 12:39 quote
I have lived in th USA most of my life, and there never has been any proof of voting iregularities. The only exeption being all the dead democrats who vote every election in the Chicago area.
When the left loses an election, they always piss and moan, "it must have been a set up, the machines were hacked, we didn't have the right people counting! or, the voters are stupid"
When the right loses, they just shrug their shoulders, and say, " we lost, we will try again next time"
That tells me a lot.
18.10.2006, 16:12 quote
| tyne wrote: |
| I have lived in th USA most of my life, and there never has been any proof of voting iregularities. The only exeption being all the dead democrats who vote every election in the Chicago area.
When the left loses an election, they always piss and moan, "it must have been a set up, the machines were hacked, we didn't have the right people counting! or, the voters are stupid" When the right loses, they just shrug their shoulders, and say, " we lost, we will try again next time" That tells me a lot. |
Hmm, people in Florida who tradtionally voted Democrat with names remotely sounding like that of a convicted felon not being allowed to vote; lack of voting hardware in areas likely to vote Democrat.
18.10.2006, 16:42 quote
Hmm, people in Florida who tradtionally voted Democrat with names remotely sounding like that of a convicted felon not being allowed to vote; lack of voting hardware in areas likely to vote Democrat.[quote]
Whizzer is a typical example of the arrogance of the left. The left lost, so it must have been a fix. He probably heard the leftist media, The BBC etc, say that there may have been some irreglarities. Everthing was investigated, and the leftists came up with nothing.
As far as the convicted felon theory goes, when you apply for a voting card, you are refused if you are a convicted felon. When you go to vote, all you have to do is produce your card, and away you go. The way you say your name is never an issue.
That's how dumb the left is, and how the facts mean nothing.
Next time Whizzer votes in Florida, he can tell us all about it.
18.10.2006, 17:34 quote
[quote="tyne"]Hmm, people in Florida who tradtionally voted Democrat with names remotely sounding like that of a convicted felon not being allowed to vote; lack of voting hardware in areas likely to vote Democrat.
| Quote: |
|
Whizzer is a typical example of the arrogance of the left. The left lost, so it must have been a fix. He probably heard the leftist media, The BBC etc, say that there may have been some irreglarities. Everthing was investigated, and the leftists came up with nothing. As far as the convicted felon theory goes, when you apply for a voting card, you are refused if you are a convicted felon. When you go to vote, all you have to do is produce your card, and away you go. The way you say your name is never an issue. That's how dumb the left is, and how the facts mean nothing. Next time Whizzer votes in Florida, he can tell us all about it. |
Just a shame the goverment always gets in
06.01.2007, 17:18 quote
"Jamison2 has got it right - he understands the primary issues involved and doesn't blunt his reasoning by looking at secondary ones like Alabaster.
I wonder how much they will enjoy living in a future Islamic Republic?
Funnily enough the greed and power will still be there."
When has Islamic Republic ever attempted to take over our country?
Besides........NEVER.
When a government deceives its own people for political reasons, as well as the sake of controlling the oil revenue of another country, and the lives of some citizens are the price paid, I hardly see that as "secondary".
We house two organizations that have trained more terrorists than any other organization in the world. The CIA and the School of Americas. If you want to stop terrorism, you have to stop participating in it first. There are different forms of terrorism. Not all of them are laced in the Koran and wearing a turban.
As far as any proof that the voting machines had discrepencies, several official county counsels had noted on their websites...........official websites....not blogs.......that there were major discrepencies of the voting process. One example, here............there were thousands of votes more than there were registered voters for that district. Guess who those surplus votes were for? Districts across the nation have been reporting the same problems and others similiar. Yell "conspiracy theory" all you want to, but every conspiracy that turned out to be a reality started out as theory, first. But perhaps you haven't been paying attention to the media. What Bush supporters have been yelling "oh it's just a conspiracy theory", are now seeing it coming out in the open.
As far as those who see these discrepencies as being on the far left...........I happen to be a registered Republican.
so much for YOUR conspiracy theory
_________________
Religion is man's way of guessing the mysteries of Nature.
Science is Nature's way of saying, "you guessed wrong."
06.01.2007, 17:28 quote
As far as the question about how I come to the conclusion that religion is a form of schizophrenia, I'll tell you.
I worked in psych for years evaluating human behavior.
Take religion vs schizophrenia.
Both have "invisible" forces they believe to exist, even though there is no proof to support either. Each having an individual relationship with that entity, whether it be one of fear, love, respect, admiration or simply acknowledging they exist. Yet, one has as much proof that one exists, as does the other.
Each finding comfort or fear in this "relationship" with this invisible entity, even go as far as to have "conversations" with them.
for example.......there was a coworker in a hospital that I worked at. A few people, myself included, witnessed this woman talking in a conversation, when no one else was present. We happened to walk up on her without her realizing we were there. We were all concerned, of course, and questioned her mental stability. (You'd have to have heard the conversation to have understood why) One of the admins who was with us whispered "She must be schizophrenic"........and he was deeply concerned. We decided to make our presence known and he asked her in a cavalier way, "Who were you talking to?".........the woman said, "I was discussing an issue with God".......all the sudden my coworker was no longer concerned. He simply replied, "Oh, okay".......then after she left, he confided in us, "I was beginning to worry about her".
so you see.......two very similar states, that can even be mistaken for each other. Why? Because there is very little, if any, difference between the two.
_________________
Religion is man's way of guessing the mysteries of Nature.
Science is Nature's way of saying, "you guessed wrong."
06.01.2007, 17:38 quote
If you sit in a room talking to imaginary people, people think you are a bit mad. If you sit in a room and talk to a god, people think thats OK.
Ive seen people shouting in the street about their god and no one worries, Ive seen drunks doing the same, shouting in the street to their imaginary friends and people give them a wide berth. Why? Its the same behaviour. (Oh, I also saw a drunk fight with his imaginary friend once - I had to stop to watch it was that funny him trying to hit the friend).
Oh, Im not having a go at religion here, religion has an important role to play in society, its the fairy stories they tell us that I have problems with.
03.02.2007, 03:44 quote
This is for the Lady/Gent (it's really not important enough for me to look back to see which) who said they haven't seen any voting discrepancies come out of the presidential elections.
http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/news/state/16536269.htm
"2 election workers convicted of rigging '04 presidential recount"
And that's just one county. There are others coming out in the news as well.
Thought that may be of some interest to you.
_________________
Religion is man's way of guessing the mysteries of Nature.
Science is Nature's way of saying, "you guessed wrong."
02.11.2007, 22:37 quote
| Sarge55 wrote: |
| "All war is based on deception." -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
There is nothing new in a government lying to their people to start a war. Indeed because most people prefer living in peace to bloody and horrific death in war, any government that desires to initiate a war usually lies to their people to create the illusion that support for the war is the only possible choice they can make. MORE........ http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/lieofthecentury.html |
A War On Terror is needed, terrorism is a scourge of modern times. However! The thing the Bush-Blair Axis call a War On Terror is not designed to fight against terrorism - but to further advance the New World Order.
A war against terrorism does require foreign military intervention, that is true - but what, pray tell, are they gonna achieve by tieing forces down in Iraq with this 'nation building' nonsense?? They should instead just topple governments who do harbour terrorists, then leave, then move onto the next target - rogue states around the world will soon get the message - and the terror training camps will close down abruptly, lest their positions of power be threathened. More of a deterrent than anything else. Minimum loss of life.
But what message are they sending terrorists as it's stands with the Iraq War? That US/UK forces are tied down in a 'Vietnam-style quagmire', that it'll be a long time before the US or UK get a chance to open a new front on the WOT - it only serves to encourage terrorists around the world.
To Bush and Blair (now Brown): Abandon your NWO agenda and actually fight a damn war against terrorism! (That includes tackling illegal immigration..)
10.04.2008, 03:06 quote
You can blame Saddam for the lies that started the war.He told the world he had WMD's and had used them numerous times on some of the Iraqi people.
10.04.2008, 22:36 quote
To win 100 battles is NOT the acme of skill in war. Sun Tzu.
The purpose of war is the make the enemy do your will. Carl von Clausewitz.
Ergo to win without fighting IS the acme of skill in war, to win without striking a single blow, to render your enemy, your friend who willingly performs your will. That is the mastry of war.
In the context of Iraq the proof that no one is master of war is revealed, though this is due to a lack of understanding on all sides, since they did not know each other well enough, war was the result.
People have some very selective memories over Iraq, and its clear there is a deeper ideological force that has sought to use outrage over the Iraq War to that purpose.
Rather like Vietnam, where the US won the battles but was forced not only to withdraw but to betray South Vietnam to the North. Vietnam was fought and won in the USA not in Vietnam which is ironic, the fighting really was irrelevent as was the victories in battle.
There is also some serious forgetfullness over the post Vietnam consequences too.
Another example for the UK is Aden, which is very much the product of Nasser 'winning' Suez.
11.04.2008, 00:31 quote
Here's my opinion of how a war should be fought.
Tony blair, george bush and Sadam hussein in a boxing ring... who-ever's left standing, wins.
that way, all those people that have died FOR NO F'KING REASON would still be alive today. It's all well and bloody good declaring war, when your sat at a big desk in your comfy f'kin chair knowing full well that everyone but your own blood is going to be spilt. That IN MY OPINION makes the people that declare war GUTLESS BASTARDS ! ![]()
_________________
Myspace clicky
Facebook Clicky
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




