Posts: 327174 Topics: 12963 LOGIN

Favourites

 

Home >> World-issues >> 9/11 - An Inside Job

05.12.2007, 00:19 quote

CostaCork
Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 367 Location: Ireland, Cork, Cork
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Cazzabee wrote:
Greystone wrote:
CostaCork wrote:
I see what you did there completely avoid that fact that its impossible for two planes to knock down those kind of structures.
But they were knocked down by being hit by two planes! Millions of people saw it happen on TV sets around the world.

Despite people claiming that such buildings couldn't collapse from areoplane impacts they did. Just like the Titanic sank after hitting an iceberg even though many people had claimed it was unsinkable.

Whatever the experts claim about something they can never know for sure before until it actually happens. Two fuel laden planes had never been flown into two skyscrapers at high speed before 9/11 so no one knew for sure exactly what would happen in such a case.


Have to say Greystone has a point here....


But did you read any of my posts above? People, i'm telling you ... there is no way those planes knocked those towers.

Can you explain the explosions seen below the falling building?
Why did building seven collapse even though it wasn't hit by a plane?

I know they are not coming straight out and admitting it but read between the lines.

To be honest, i give up now Very Happy

I think theres enough in this thread for people who want to find out more. Its peoples decision to investigate and decide themselves. I only want people to be open minded, i'd agree its hard to believe, its hard to think people would do something like this.

 

05.12.2007, 10:01 quote

Greystone
Greystone Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Posts: 419 Location: United Kingdom, England, London
View user's profile Visit poster's website

CostaCork wrote:
But did you read any of my posts above? People, i'm telling you ... there is no way those planes knocked those towers.
But those buildings did collapse because of the impact and fires caused by those two plans hitting them!
Quote:
Can you explain the explosions seen below the falling building?
Burning jet fuel from the planes pouring down stair wells and lift shafts causeing secondary fires and causing electronic tranformers in the building to explode. Those building contained large electronic transformers to cope with the electrical demand from the building.
Quote:
Why did building seven collapse even though it wasn't hit by a plane?
Because it was hit by hundreds of tons of falling buring debris from the other two towers and this severely weakened it, the burning falling debris also caused a major fire in WTC 7 as well. Other buildings near the twin towers were also severely damaged.

 

05.12.2007, 17:34 quote

CostaCork
Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 367 Location: Ireland, Cork, Cork
View user's profile Visit poster's website

You're right Greystone .... thats exactly what happened Wink

 

16.12.2007, 11:39 quote

CostaCork
Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 367 Location: Ireland, Cork, Cork
View user's profile Visit poster's website

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS8eeyXg2Ks

Its too big for people to think about

 

08.10.2008, 01:28 quote

28mystical
28mystical Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 2 Location: United Kingdom, England, Lancashire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

1. The passengers on the planes where government agents with names that where made up so nobody would miss them because they didnt exist.
2. The planes where at a quarter of there capacity compared to any other day of the year.
3. Two of the planes have no flight manifest, which means there is no record of them even taking off.
4. These planes where supposed to be flying at 560 mph when hit the world trade which is cruise speed at 35,000 feet at the altitude it was flying the plane would have broken apart before hitting the WTC. Which begs the question did a plane hit the WTC at all. No black boxes found, 1 engine found but wrong make of the right model, plane explodes inside the building rather than on impact and if u slow the footage down frame by frame the titanium plane disolves into the building completely before the fuel ignites which does not happen with jet fuel it ignites immediately on impact which with an explosion would blow parts of the plane everywhere.
5. Pancake theory? the buildings fall down because the floors fall on top of eachother is proven to be false because the bulidings fall in 10 seconds flat which is 10 floors per second which is scientifically immpossible due to laws of gravity. If they fall at freefall then there is no resistance, so the pancake theory is a lie.
6. WTC 7 a 47 storey building facing the two towers fell in 6.5 seconds with no plane even hitting the building and it had only had minor damage from debris falling off wtc 2 not nearly enough to bring the building down faster than freefall. This is the smoking gun because I challenge anybody to watch that builing fall and say it wasn't controlled demolition.
7. The pentagon! The pilot flies the plane over the pentagon performs a miracle 180 decends 7000 feet in a second then slams into the part of the building that is reinforced and is undergoing a refurbishment and the only people killed are contactors. No plane found, no engines, no blackbox this is becoming a pattern.
8. I coul go on forever honestly I could but the official 9/11 commision report is an out and out LIE from start to finsh. It answers no questions at all just makes more questions that don't get answered.
Ask this would we be where we are now without 9/11?

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum