Favourites
Most popular topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Police try to shut down n... (114)
- Time to get tough with Ir... (86)
- Why is Britain a broken C... (56)
- THE LIE OF THE CENTURY... (54)
- Griffin at it again!!!... (53)
- Controversial anti-Rape D... (50)
- smoking ban.... hmmm?... (47)
- Woo Hoo! Obama is now US ... (47)
- hardcore jobless face los... (47)
- Far-Right Politics... (40)
- London Anti-War Protests... (38)
- NEW ZEALAND... (37)
- Ethnic Cleansing in Gaza... (37)
- Should welfare recipients... (37)
- HAPPY NEWS!!!!... (35)
- this is sickening!!!... (35)
- Britain takes case agains... (34)
- 9/11 - An Inside Job... (34)
- Athiests bus ads... (34)
- US sets possible Time tab... (33)
- Ever heard anything so ST... (33)
- Why Do People Mock Scient... (32)
- Vat down to 15% means 2.1... (31)
- Moore sued by US Soldier... (30)
- We were lied to about 9/1... (30)
Latest topics | World-issuesopen/close
- Demonstrations last weeke...
- The bees: Humanity's cana...
- who need a man very stron...
- South Africa - What the U...
- Isn’t democracy just a my...
- Middle East flaring up?...
- (UK) Reduce petrol petit...
- My Scottish & interna...
- Light bulb vs. energy-sav...
- THE DANGERS OF BOVINE IGF...
- wikileaks.org offline...
- Israel killed british,iri...
- Israel killed 19 peace ac...
- South Africa- What the UK...
- Falklands oil debate...
- I need an oriental guy!! ...
- Griffin at it again!!!...
- Haiti Earthquake Measure ...
- kelly suicide verdict bei...
- March election now lookin...
- Gary McKinnon...
- Why I may appear to be a ...
- Dating overseas from the ...
- Why is Britain a broken C...
- Far-Right Politics...
Home >> World-issues >> 9/11 - An Inside Job
05.12.2007, 00:19 quote
| Cazzabee wrote: | ||||
Have to say Greystone has a point here.... |
But did you read any of my posts above? People, i'm telling you ... there is no way those planes knocked those towers.
Can you explain the explosions seen below the falling building?
Why did building seven collapse even though it wasn't hit by a plane?
I know they are not coming straight out and admitting it but read between the lines.
To be honest, i give up now
I think theres enough in this thread for people who want to find out more. Its peoples decision to investigate and decide themselves. I only want people to be open minded, i'd agree its hard to believe, its hard to think people would do something like this.
05.12.2007, 10:01 quote
| CostaCork wrote: |
| But did you read any of my posts above? People, i'm telling you ... there is no way those planes knocked those towers. |
| Quote: |
| Can you explain the explosions seen below the falling building? |
| Quote: |
| Why did building seven collapse even though it wasn't hit by a plane? |
16.12.2007, 11:39 quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS8eeyXg2Ks
Its too big for people to think about
08.10.2008, 01:28 quote
1. The passengers on the planes where government agents with names that where made up so nobody would miss them because they didnt exist.
2. The planes where at a quarter of there capacity compared to any other day of the year.
3. Two of the planes have no flight manifest, which means there is no record of them even taking off.
4. These planes where supposed to be flying at 560 mph when hit the world trade which is cruise speed at 35,000 feet at the altitude it was flying the plane would have broken apart before hitting the WTC. Which begs the question did a plane hit the WTC at all. No black boxes found, 1 engine found but wrong make of the right model, plane explodes inside the building rather than on impact and if u slow the footage down frame by frame the titanium plane disolves into the building completely before the fuel ignites which does not happen with jet fuel it ignites immediately on impact which with an explosion would blow parts of the plane everywhere.
5. Pancake theory? the buildings fall down because the floors fall on top of eachother is proven to be false because the bulidings fall in 10 seconds flat which is 10 floors per second which is scientifically immpossible due to laws of gravity. If they fall at freefall then there is no resistance, so the pancake theory is a lie.
6. WTC 7 a 47 storey building facing the two towers fell in 6.5 seconds with no plane even hitting the building and it had only had minor damage from debris falling off wtc 2 not nearly enough to bring the building down faster than freefall. This is the smoking gun because I challenge anybody to watch that builing fall and say it wasn't controlled demolition.
7. The pentagon! The pilot flies the plane over the pentagon performs a miracle 180 decends 7000 feet in a second then slams into the part of the building that is reinforced and is undergoing a refurbishment and the only people killed are contactors. No plane found, no engines, no blackbox this is becoming a pattern.
8. I coul go on forever honestly I could but the official 9/11 commision report is an out and out LIE from start to finsh. It answers no questions at all just makes more questions that don't get answered.
Ask this would we be where we are now without 9/11?
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


