Following on from heygirls thread, if you had to choose, would you choose a gal with a good body and plain face or an attractive face but not a good body?

good face, like you said, a body can be worked on but a face we are stuck with all our lives. sex is a great way of using up calories.....

From first impressions a pretty face will always win, but a good body would be better. Just personnal really - a good body on a 30 year old suggests they have an active lifestyle and so do I so there is more chance of common interests.


Plain faces? Well you can get round that by walking hand in hand (cant see face then), close eyes when kissing, bags over the head, spoons, lots of little things to do.


Plain faces are OK, its the ugly ones I have the problems with. Not ugly by birth (few people are), but the ones whose faces twisted and show that they are angry with life.

Can you put a massive pair of tits as an option as thats the first thing I look for when eyeing up a bird.

I’m sort of to drunk to read the whole thread

To answer the original question...

Neither and then some

If there is one thing I’ve learned it’s that looks mean almost nothing to me, people who go after looks only are complete and utter idiots! A big fat congrats to my sisters pal btw who went after looks only and ended up with hep C.
_________________
Nobody understands the importance of sex better than someone who isn’t getting any.

Thanks scottie

Um, great body does it for me tbh, a nice face is a bonus tho i have to say, whats the saying tho?

You don't look at the mantlepiece while poking the fire

LMFAO
_________________
Please read the forum guidelines before you post