Posts: 436752 Topics: 21972 LOGIN

Favourites

 

Home >> Love & Relationships >> Babies in new relationships.

23.11.2008, 19:15 quote

snaithman

When a couple have started a new relationship, Becky and myself have been discussing this.

If a new relationship is working and looking to the future, we believe they should have children together, if at a child bearing age.

What do you think?
Nevermind the practicing.

 

23.11.2008, 19:21 quote

Loveleelady
Loveleelady Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 434 Location: United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, Belfast
View user's profile Visit poster's website

gosh isn't it a bit quick to be rushing into babies?

 

23.11.2008, 19:22 quote

baggiebhoy
baggiebhoy Joined: 06 Mar 2008 Posts: 6111 Location: United Kingdom, England, West Midlands
View user's profile Visit poster's website

They've had an accident Razz Laughing Twisted Evil
_________________

 

23.11.2008, 19:23 quote

ed85

I disagree for many reasons - income, time, actually wanting a baby are just a few. In other words if the child won't have a good life, what is the point?

 

23.11.2008, 19:39 quote

god

How long would you wait though?

2 years, 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, 8 years, 10 years?

 

23.11.2008, 19:41 quote

baggiebhoy
baggiebhoy Joined: 06 Mar 2008 Posts: 6111 Location: United Kingdom, England, West Midlands
View user's profile Visit poster's website

I think you have to wait nine months for a baby to come along.

Thought God would have known that Laughing
_________________

 

23.11.2008, 19:41 quote

snaithman

Read the original post.
It says of child bearing age.
The amount of time is also up for discussion.

 

23.11.2008, 19:49 quote

rocketgirl

snaithman wrote:
When a couple have started a new relationship, Becky and myself have been discussing this.

If a new relationship is working and looking to the future, we believe they should have children together, if at a child bearing age.

What do you think?
Nevermind the practicing.



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not everyone wants to have kids, where the heck does the word "should" come into it??????
For what reason do you believe people "should not" have the choice?
Half the people in this world are incapable of looking after the kids that they 'chose' to have, and those kids suffer the consequences, I really have to disagree quite strongly with your statement there.

 

23.11.2008, 19:53 quote

redelicious
redelicious Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 1609 Location: United Kingdom, England, Lincolnshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

snaithman wrote:
When a couple have started a new relationship, Becky and myself have been discussing this.

If a new relationship is working and looking to the future, we believe they should have children together, if at a child bearing age.

What do you think?
Nevermind the practicing.


At any age, I think something like this needs time. Time to get used to each other and time to get used to the idea of another little one. You both have children from other relationships and like it or not, you also need to think about the impact on them.

I'm not sure if you are speaking about yourselves personally, but if you are, I'm really sorry if this offends, but Bex's MS also has to be taken into consideration.

Never mind the fact that a child is always hard work, even when they've left home Wink but would pregnancy effect the MS?
_________________
"Always look on the bright side of life..... tetum tetumtetumtetum....."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHPOzQzk9Qo

 

23.11.2008, 19:54 quote

cheekykev

Well with me and Kev, we spoke about all this before we even met, not much point of going into a relationship with one who wants more kids and one who doesnt.

 

23.11.2008, 19:55 quote

rocketgirl

So, if I start a new relationship when I am 55 and my partner is 70, we SHOULD have some kids, because you say so?
We'd both be 'of child bearing age' after all.
Or is there some benchmark, say I've already had 2 kids in a previous relationship and so has my old fella, so we dont have to produce more?
From what you are saying snaith, *you* should never have had that vasectomy then eh? We *should* be expecting you and Bex to produce a sprog in about 9 months time. dont tell me you are both too old, cuz biologically thats bollocks, you just choose not to, that's all.... Razz

 

23.11.2008, 19:56 quote

grooveme
grooveme Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 1532 Location: United Kingdom, Scotland, Glasgow
View user's profile Visit poster's website

RG hit the nail on the head!!! They are exactly my thoughts on the subject. I will also add bringing a child into the world just because the couple think they 'should' is incredibly selfish on their part.

 

23.11.2008, 19:58 quote

Loveleelady
Loveleelady Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 434 Location: United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, Belfast
View user's profile Visit poster's website

children are the biggest committment people can make to each other and require so much love, care, nurturing, guidance and safety in life that really before rushing into them people should try to build a good firm relationship and lets be honest that takes time - time to truly get to know each other, to love each other and create a good foundation for the future - so many broken homes nowadays, maybe if in some of those cases time had been taken to build the relationship before having children then things would be different

 

23.11.2008, 20:02 quote

redelicious
redelicious Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 1609 Location: United Kingdom, England, Lincolnshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

rocketgirl wrote:
So, if I start a new relationship when I am 55 and my partner is 70, we SHOULD have some kids, because you say so?
We'd both be 'of child bearing age' after all.
Or is there some benchmark, say I've already had 2 kids in a previous relationship and so has my old fella, so we dont have to produce more?
From what you are saying snaith, *you* should never have had that vasectomy then eh? We *should* be expecting you and Bex to produce a sprog in about 9 months time. dont tell me you are both too old, cuz biologically thats bollocks, you just choose not to, that's all.... Razz
Sorry to be picky RG, but there aren't many women of 55 who could concieve naturally.
_________________
"Always look on the bright side of life..... tetum tetumtetumtetum....."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHPOzQzk9Qo

 

23.11.2008, 20:09 quote

70

I think couples should really give this serious consideration, and neither should feel pressurised to agree with something as important as bringing a new life into the world.

If there is disagreement on this topic may be the relationship is doomed from the word go.

Obviously the older one is, there are more health risks to consider, especially if it's a first child.

I had my first child at 28 and back then, I was considered to be an old 'new mum'.... well until a lady came in who was 56!!........ Sh** I wouldn't want that to happen to me Confused

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum