Posts: 130787 Topics: 9284 LOGIN

Home >> Love & Relationships >> Babies in new relationships.

23.11.2008, 20:49 quote

rocketgirl

snaithman wrote:
When a couple have started a new relationship, Becky and myself have been discussing this.

If a new relationship is working and looking to the future, we believe they should have children together, if at a child bearing age.

What do you think?
Nevermind the practicing.



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not everyone wants to have kids, where the heck does the word "should" come into it??????
For what reason do you believe people "should not" have the choice?
Half the people in this world are incapable of looking after the kids that they 'chose' to have, and those kids suffer the consequences, I really have to disagree quite strongly with your statement there.

 

23.11.2008, 20:55 quote

rocketgirl

So, if I start a new relationship when I am 55 and my partner is 70, we SHOULD have some kids, because you say so?
We'd both be 'of child bearing age' after all.
Or is there some benchmark, say I've already had 2 kids in a previous relationship and so has my old fella, so we dont have to produce more?
From what you are saying snaith, *you* should never have had that vasectomy then eh? We *should* be expecting you and Bex to produce a sprog in about 9 months time. dont tell me you are both too old, cuz biologically thats bollocks, you just choose not to, that's all.... Razz

 

23.11.2008, 21:17 quote

rocketgirl

[quote="redelicious[/quote]Sorry to be picky RG, but there aren't many women of 55 who could concieve naturally.[/quote]

True, but the point I was making was that if a woman of 55 (and there are many out there, just maybe not so many as younger age) who biologically is capable, *should* they be obliged to have a baby *just because* they have gotten into a new relationship and can?
Who decides where to draw the line, and how and why?
Or do we leave that decision to the couple themselves?

 

24.11.2008, 22:28 quote

rocketgirl

snaithman wrote:
Ha, ha, I cannot believe how easy most of you are.
Some of you really don't get where I am coming from.
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Hark! Me hears the sound of backpeddling.
Razz

 

24.11.2008, 23:05 quote

rocketgirl

ed85 wrote:
This thread reeks of bullshit


Baby poo.

 

24.11.2008, 23:55 quote

rocketgirl

snaithman wrote:
rocketgirl wrote:
snaithman wrote:
Ha, ha, I cannot believe how easy most of you are.
Some of you really don't get where I am coming from.
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Hark! Me hears the sound of backpeddling.
Razz

That comment would not be made through embarrassment, I am sure.


Embarrassment? Who me? What on earth for?
On forums such as this, we do have to take one another at face value somewhat, unless it is made clear something is posted in jest....which it clearly was not.
I have nothing to feel embarrassed for, I can assure you.

 

25.11.2008, 00:08 quote

rocketgirl

My point exactly. Rolling Eyes

/shuffles off to do something more interesting/

 

25.11.2008, 00:21 quote

rocketgirl

/nips briefly back in to say...../

No, thats not interesting. It's just annoying when someone takes the piss.
When people make serious comments about a supposedly serious topic, it aint nice to then be laughed at for taking it serious.
If you are going to say summat in jest, say so or expect people to be pissed off with you. Simple As.

I'm away from here now.

 

25.11.2008, 14:01 quote

rocketgirl

They were originally used in therapy to help parents whose baby had died, then the market opened up to other people wanting 'something different'.
I have to say I find them rather creepy even though they are very beautifully made.
In the 80's not many parents took photos of new born babies and became a thing that when a baby died the parents were encouraged to dress it up and take photos.
I saw this on both sides, I was a volunteer worker at the local SCBU and one of my jobs was to help the parents dress the baby and take the photos (being a photographer at the time) and as I also worked in a photo processing plant I printed a lot of these kinds of photos.
(I didnt take the photos and print the same ones, in case anyone thinks I made money out of these tragedies!)
Nowadays, its the norm for people to snap away in the delivery room and onwards, so I dont suppose they do that much now.
But yes, they are wonderful creations, very pretty and impressive.
I thought the first 3 pics were of real sleeping babies, the last one with the orange lipstick and weird fingernails and too-smooth skin dropped the penny. Very Happy

 

25.11.2008, 17:05 quote

rocketgirl

Aww Raven, I thought they are gorgeous, just a tad too life-like for me!

 

27.11.2008, 22:13 quote

bexbex

There isn't a Geisha on her, Tony meant Geisha girls as in the Japanese painted ladies?

 

23.12.2008, 02:00 quote

rocketgirl

workingman92 wrote:
wait for a little bit dont rush cause your going to have hell if you rush into something like that


I think you will find the opening question was a piss take and real serious replies are/were not required. Razz

 

24.12.2008, 16:40 quote

bexbex

choochi0 wrote:
Don't waste your time posting on here. The OP was talking utter nonsense!!!!


Absolutely!!

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum