Favourites
Most popular topics | Films & Moviesopen/close
- Last film you saw... (714)
- Guess that movie quote!... (139)
- The Greatest Movies Ever... (88)
- what i'm watching now... (66)
- X-men 3... (58)
- Fav Star Trek Movie... (58)
- Your 5 Favorites Movies?... (52)
- Tear jerkers... (51)
- here it is, LOTR forum!... (50)
- Best War Movies?... (47)
- Choices, choices... (42)
- Lost.....literally... (42)
- Vampire Films... (40)
- Your worst film?... (40)
- Fave Sci-Fi movie that is... (39)
- Batman The Dark Knight...... (38)
- Greatest Sc-fi movie?... (38)
- Movies I highly recommend... (38)
- Best Horror Movie... (37)
- Favourite film star... (35)
- Shawshank Redemtion... (35)
- Watership down... (33)
- what scarry movies do u l... (33)
- What are your favourite n... (29)
- Funniest or weepiest film... (29)
Latest topics | Films & Moviesopen/close
- Hollywood does Scotland...
- Least funny tv comedy pro...
- Miss Naked Beauty...
- How do you format a panas...
- What Celebrity Do You Loo...
- Life on ITV3...
- Heroes...
- TV: Dead Set on E4 is pre...
- Steven King...
- All time fav British Sitc...
- Dead Set...
- Walking out the cinema...
- House.....
- Top 500 films...
- Flight of the Conchords?...
- Scrubs...
- Ong Bak and Warrior King...
- Battle Royale anyone...
- Taken!!...
- The worst movie ever?...
- Anyone seen Death Race ye...
- Life On Mars U.S Version...
- Tropic Thunder...
- Post Apocalyptic...
- Loose Women :(...
Home >> Films & Movies >> X-men 3
04.06.2006, 13:06 quote
Hollywood just cash in on the most popular character without giving the other a chance! thats why the comics will always be more sucessful, such a variety of well developed characters!
04.06.2006, 13:49 quote
| Kimberley88 wrote: |
| Hollywood just cash in on the most popular character without giving the other a chance! thats why the comics will always be more sucessful, such a variety of well developed characters! |
Gambit was more popular than Wolverine, yet he never makes an appearance in the movies.
That was always the problem I had with them, he was bloody marvellous.
04.06.2006, 14:56 quote
Gambit was not more popular than Wolverine, Which is why Wolverine appears in every xman line up, New Avengers, has two ongoing solo series. Gambit has had two ongoing series both of which have been cancelled. Not that i dislike Gambit on the contrary I think he is great.
But digression aside there, the problem that will always be faced in a team movie is the amount of time they can put to character development.
They would not have done Gambit justice i don't think. I remember hearing rumours of Van Damme playing him at one point *shudders*
04.06.2006, 14:59 quote
| Ryts8 wrote: |
| Gambit was not more popular than Wolverine, Which is why Wolverine appears in every xman line up, New Avengers, has two ongoing solo series. Gambit has had two ongoing series both of which have been cancelled. Not that i dislike Gambit on the contrary I think he is great.
But digression aside there, the problem that will always be faced in a team movie is the amount of time they can put to character development. They would not have done Gambit justice i don't think. I remember hearing rumours of Van Damme playing him at one point *shudders* |
I'd disagree over his popularity - but I agree that he'd be wasted in the format these movies took.
I think they should have been more in keeping with the animated series. Admittedly telling those stories would have been impossible, but the filmed needed to be "adapted for all audiences" which alienated a lot of hardcore fans.
04.06.2006, 15:03 quote
| Swiss Rebel wrote: |
| I'd disagree over his popularity - but I agree that he'd be wasted in the format these movies took. |
Disagree because it is your opinion or because the figures back you up
Besides the animated series didn't really work for me either. Look what they did with Colossus!
Considering the medium they were using to tell there story they did a fairly good job. Of course people will always say: well they missed out so and so or they did a bad job adapting this character (which I have said and done before) but it still is a good comic book film.
At least it wasn't another Spawn or Judge Dredd
04.06.2006, 15:12 quote
I have to admit the reason why i felt so let down would have been because of my love of the books.
you say look what they did to Colossus in the TV stuff, at least they did something with him!!
just think of the film and see just HOW under developed the characters are.
i have to admit im a bigger fan of Gambit than wolverine, but hey, im just one person!
i also agree witht he 'alienation' of hardcore fans, and lets face it, theres alot of them!
I did, however, love the first movie in those terms (sticking to the books) and even though the second deviated from the comics i loved that one too!
which just shows how disasterous the third one was
04.06.2006, 15:14 quote
| Ryts8 wrote: | ||
Disagree because it is your opinion or because the figures back you up Besides the animated series didn't really work for me either. Look what they did with Colossus! Considering the medium they were using to tell there story they did a fairly good job. Of course people will always say: well they missed out so and so or they did a bad job adapting this character (which I have said and done before) but it still is a good comic book film. At least it wasn't another Spawn or Judge Dredd |
Well sales statistics are hardly a judgement call on the community - there was massive outcry about Gambit missing from the films, and Wolverine always got better stories anyway. It's debatable that either of them were really any good anyway - I was always a bigger fan of the bad guys, and obviously i'm biased because I did like Gambit.
I think it was because Wolverine was more of a mainstream character to the public - he's the one most "non-fans" would associate with x-men, along with Cyclops. Who, I might add - was the worst character conversion from comic-to-film.
On your last point - Spawn was certainly better than Judge Dredd though, but that's hardly a compliment
04.06.2006, 15:18 quote
| Quote: |
| I think it was because Wolverine was more of a mainstream character to the public - he's the one most "non-fans" would associate with x-men, along with Cyclops |
very good point. fans of the comics tended to have other favourates, i say 'tended'.
Gambit only seemed to get storylines revolving around Rogue or Sinister! poor guy, he could have been put to much better use!!
04.06.2006, 15:21 quote
See, I really didn't like Rogue in the movies. At all.
She was the one the kids were apparently supposed to "associate with" in the films. That butchered her character for me.
Obviously, just my opinion
04.06.2006, 15:21 quote
I am also a big fan of the books. However I never expected them to make a direct comic to film adaptation. The sheer level of continuity they would need to explain makes it implausible. As for the cartoon doing something with Colussus - he was in one episode, and that was a fairly poor one.
| swissrebel wrote: |
| Well sales statistics are hardly a judgement call on the community |
Of course it is! If Gambit was more popular then he would have more sales than Wolverine. Or are you saying that people like Gambit more but prefer to buy the Wolverine comic instead?
As for Cyclops being worst character conversion that isn't fair. Cyclops is the worst Xman in the comics and low and behold in the films...
04.06.2006, 15:25 quote
| Ryts8 wrote: | ||
I am also a big fan of the books. However I never expected them to make a direct comic to film adaptation. The sheer level of continuity they would need to explain makes it implausible. As for the cartoon doing something with Colussus - he was in one episode, and that was a fairly poor one.
Of course it is! If Gambit was more popular then he would have more sales than Wolverine. Or are you saying that people like Gambit more but prefer to buy the Wolverine comic instead? As for Cyclops being worst character conversion that isn't fair. Cyclops is the worst Xman in the comics and low and behold in the films... |
Yeah, sales statistics can be misleading - they're never an accurate representation, some people will fanatically buy the comics no matter what, other's will buy just what's out at the moment. Wolverine's stories were always more mainstream for most part-time fans, his character was easier for people to pick up.
And as for wolverine in the animated series? Come oooon
This is probably the worst place to discuss it though, it seems there's only about 4 of us who actually read the comics
04.06.2006, 15:26 quote
What they did to Rogue in the films was a crime. there was barely anything that remotely connected her to the comic Rogue, bar her powers and slightly her relationship with wolverine.
X-men evolution i found was quite good, a bit 'kiddy' you could say but i loved it! it did sometimes veer off track from the regular x-men storylines but even the comics all have seperate titles and often dont follow eachother!
04.06.2006, 15:35 quote
Yeah Wolverine in the animated series was alright. He acted tough but kept getting beat up, just like in the comics
And yes Rogue was bad. She needed more Southern spunk like in the comics.
X-Men Evolution was funny. I enjoyed watching it when it was on.
04.06.2006, 15:36 quote
| Ryts8 wrote: |
| Yeah Wolverine in the animated series was alright. He acted tough but kept getting beat up, just like in the comics And yes Rogue was bad. She needed more Southern spunk like in the comics. X-Men Evolution was funny. I enjoyed watching it when it was on. |
It'd have helped if she could fly. I heard something about them flying in the third film?
04.06.2006, 15:37 quote
She would have needed to have stolen someones powers or deviated from the comic more by giving her more powers
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



