Favourites
Most popular topics | Datingopen/close
- What would you do with th... (6992)
- Crush? Wanna know if you'... (3796)
- is ther any men out there... (590)
- tell us who you want to d... (345)
- Sexy Accents... (327)
- the fuller figured woman.... (294)
- Approaching people you li... (279)
- Can women really go for g... (239)
- Do guys mind... (210)
- ****ing men!... (198)
Home >> Dating >> Single by choice
18.04.2008, 01:38 quote
I think single by choice doesnt sound quite right, saying that when i chose to dump my bf in january (after 4 years) i knew then and know now that if i hadn't we would still be together and happy. something wasnt right, and i dont know what it was, but we were the couple who everyone always said would stay together. I don't believe i made a mistake, i believe i needed some time to be single. im not looking here for a relationship, just a flirt. But then never say never i guess. I'm not used to being single but for now, it seems ok.
But then again, im not into promiscuity really, (not for a moral reason, just its not for me) so i am celibate, but then i used to want to be a nun, so i guess im ok with that side of things.
18.04.2008, 06:17 quote
The days of a man and women meeting each each other at 20, getting married, having kids, and living happily ever after for 60 years is probably over. Five years can be classed as a long relationship nowadays. Seems to me people are not willing to work at relationships any more, so will probably be single by choice for most of their lives.
Except for a few cases, most people now will have to get used to being single most of their lives, with a few short relationships, affairs and fuck buddies. Most people [especially people over 35ish] want relationships on their terms, with little give and take. Probably people under 30 will accept this way of life better because they will have never known long term relationships. Older people will be looking for something they once had, or maybe they think they should have.
Obviously there will be cases where people will meet, want the same things and enjoy each others company, and may well live together for a long time. But then that may not last for ever, and is probably more of a lottery.
If I do want a relationship it will probably be for selfish reasons, but then is anyone else different nowadays??
| shiftygeezer wrote: | ||||
but if you are looking around that corner then your not really happy are you ? ![]() |
That doesn't follow at all.
18.04.2008, 07:54 quote
| shiftygeezer wrote: |
| lets get this straight then shall we. Those that say you are single by choice are you also saying you are celibate by choice? or do you put it around when you feel the need and just cant be arsed to put up with a full time partner ? |
I have been celibate for 2 years now..again my choice..anyone and I mean ANYONE can go get laid..but why would I want a meaningless shag..maybe 10 years ago..but not anymore..and I do resent the fact Jim..that you would even suggest that cos I am single I 'put it around' grrrrrrrrrrr
_________________
18.04.2008, 13:55 quote
my single life has happened due to falling for girls who dont feel the same and not having feelings for the girls who like me.until that trend stops ill be single for a bit longer.
18.04.2008, 15:10 quote
| susiexxx wrote: | ||
I have been celibate for 2 years now..again my choice..anyone and I mean ANYONE can go get laid..but why would I want a meaningless shag..maybe 10 years ago..but not anymore..and I do resent the fact Jim..that you would even suggest that cos I am single I 'put it around' grrrrrrrrrrr |
I never suggest you are anyone did susie, ...i was just asking a question
18.04.2008, 18:08 quote
| katie6 wrote: |
| i am single by choice its just not my choice (if that makes sense) |
So if I chose to stop you being single, would it work?

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=559288470
http://www.myspace.com/baggiebhoy
18.04.2008, 18:30 quote
| shiftygeezer wrote: |
| lets get this straight then shall we. Those that say you are single by choice are you also saying you are celibate by choice? or do you put it around when you feel the need and just cant be arsed to put up with a full time partner ? |
I'm single by choice, but not celibate by choice.
If that means I 'put it around' when I need it because I can't put up with a partner....so be it
Seriously though.
I'm just not into the whole relationship thing at the moment after being f*cked about by the last couple of guys I've been interested in. Well. Not f*cked about as such - but them saying they like me and so on and then deciding they don't. Or worse........ignoring me because somebody better comes along.. I don't know whether it's me or what.
*mini rant over*
_________________
Laura
xx
Confidence - Wear it like make up.
18.04.2008, 18:32 quote
I think some people choose the single by choice because they're tired of getting hurt... Think someone else mentioned that around here too.
Seems like there are various reasons for choosing something like this...
As for the ideal partner = best friend... Hell, if the sex wasn't like at least 70% of a relationship then I'd definitely be married to my best friend, as I previously mentioned.
_________________
18.04.2008, 18:32 quote
it's easy to be single but no cellibate... i believe it's refered to as f**k buddies..
_________________
Myspace clicky
Facebook Clicky
18.04.2008, 19:30 quote
| jeggae wrote: | ||||||
| The days of a man and women meeting each each other at 20, getting married, having kids, and living happily ever after for 60 years is probably over. Five years can be classed as a long relationship nowadays. Seems to me people are not willing to work at relationships any more, so will probably be single by choice for most of their lives.
Except for a few cases, most people now will have to get used to being single most of their lives, with a few short relationships, affairs and fuck buddies. Most people [especially people over 35ish] want relationships on their terms, with little give and take. Probably people under 30 will accept this way of life better because they will have never known long term relationships. Older people will be looking for something they once had, or maybe they think they should have. Obviously there will be cases where people will meet, want the same things and enjoy each others company, and may well live together for a long time. But then that may not last for ever, and is probably more of a lottery. If I do want a relationship it will probably be for selfish reasons, but then is anyone else different nowadays??
That doesn't follow at all. |
well yes it does jeggs. cos if someone says to me they are happy being single BUT if someone came along who they liked then they wouldnt say no, ..then to me thats a bit of a cop out.
18.04.2008, 19:33 quote
i understand what your sayin jim, if your happy being single then you wouldn't be taking notice of who / what is round the corner - hyperthetically speaking like
_________________
Myspace clicky
Facebook Clicky
18.04.2008, 19:49 quote
That's just like sayin... If you're happy with your house it means you'll never be able to see the opportunity of someone offering you a castle...
I don't think it's that black and white... It's human nature to go for the best things... Peeps are just saying that even if they're happy with being single, it doesn't mean they'll exclude the possibility of having a great relationship with someone at some point...
However... To start over again... The real problem is with loving your house as it is, then decide you should risk it all for the mirage of the castle. I think that's the main problem. When you choose to be single, should you pick a period for which you want to be single and keep everything at a low emotion level for that period, or should you risk it all when someone great comes along?
Cause some know what the mirage of the castle is... Can you actually afford to miss any castle opportunities for the period you've chosen to be single or will you let yourself drawn into the mirage once again, just hoping this time it's going to work?
I think the one managing to resist the castle is most powerful, but, again... Can you afford to live your life without falling completely in love for a while?
Hope this made some sense.
_________________
18.04.2008, 20:45 quote
| Bliss23 wrote: |
| That's just like sayin... If you're happy with your house it means you'll never be able to see the opportunity of someone offering you a castle...
I don't think it's that black and white... It's human nature to go for the best things... Peeps are just saying that even if they're happy with being single, it doesn't mean they'll exclude the possibility of having a great relationship with someone at some point... However... To start over again... The real problem is with loving your house as it is, then decide you should risk it all for the mirage of the castle. I think that's the main problem. When you choose to be single, should you pick a period for which you want to be single and keep everything at a low emotion level for that period, or should you risk it all when someone great comes along? Cause some know what the mirage of the castle is... Can you actually afford to miss any castle opportunities for the period you've chosen to be single or will you let yourself drawn into the mirage once again, just hoping this time it's going to work? I think the one managing to resist the castle is most powerful, but, again... Can you afford to live your life without falling completely in love for a while? Hope this made some sense. |
Problem is though Liz if you pass up every opportunity that comes your way waiting for your castle you just may end up being a peasant tilling those fields forever.
18.04.2008, 20:58 quote
| shiftygeezer wrote: |
but this is a dating site lmao, ...if anyone says they are happy alone it makes me laugh cos why else are you here? ....for the gripping conversation? lol |
18.04.2008, 21:41 quote
| shiftygeezer wrote: |
Problem is though Liz if you pass up every opportunity that comes your way waiting for your castle you just may end up being a peasant tilling those fields forever. ![]() |
Don't quite get what that had to do with my post. I was actually speaking of saying no to any castle (not opportunity) which might appear, during the period you've chosen for being single, not searching for it...
The peasant... I think you just synthesized the whole topic... The peasant is the one being single by choice. Except that I think of them more as powerful people than peasants.
As for waiting for the castle... I believe you should settle for nothing else but what you truly seek for, as long as you know it exists. After all, it's not written anywhere that someone must be part of a couple. Hell, if it was meant from nature to be that way then we'd be twosomes, not individuals. If you choose (free will) to be partners with someone though, that's a whole different story.
I won't begin to tell the story of society and medium and every surrounding thing which put their prints on the individual. Now I think I need a new topic. DAMN!
_________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum







