Posts: 431623 Topics: 22594 LOGIN

Favourites

 

Home >> Dating >> Attractiveness: outside vs inside

25.08.2009, 09:44 quote

emsy86

I know what the answer is for some men..
But do we women need a man to have an outstanding personality to feel sexually attracted to him? Or can we just like men enjoy random love with the good looking & bollock brain?!

 

25.08.2009, 19:23 quote

70

Hmmm a brain would be nice.... doesn't have to be outstanding, but for me, if a guy doesn't have a bit of intellectual interest about him, I'd find it a turn off.... I guess I like the mind, body, and spirit to all be there.
This reminds me of seeing a gorgeous guy on an uncrowded bus and he started a conversation with the driver but hearing him was a complete turn off.

 

25.08.2009, 20:57 quote

yankeechick
yankeechick Joined: 28 Jul 2009 Posts: 809 Location: USA, Ohio, Crestline
View user's profile Visit poster's website

I actually find a good personality and intelligence a lot more attractive than whatever is on the outside. I would rather sleep with a guy who isn't that great looking, but could hold a conversation and make me laugh the next morning. Waking up next to an attractive jerk is not fun.

 

25.08.2009, 21:43 quote

eccles
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 2193 Location: United Kingdom, England, Somerset
View user's profile Visit poster's website

I personally look for nice eyes and smile first! just because someone is a piece of eyecandy doesn't mean to say that they don't have unpleasant traits, It's why i can't understand why peeps on dating sites are so gauche and shallow!
_________________
This guy is liscensed to chill, and thrill, but the opportunities to thrill are rather less than anticipated!!!!

 

25.08.2009, 22:45 quote

70

eccles wrote:
I personally look for nice eyes and smile first! just because someone is a piece of eyecandy doesn't mean to say that they don't have unpleasant traits, It's why i can't understand why peeps on dating sites are so gauche and shallow!


Dating sites are just a sample of all that there is and so there'll be a sample from non-dating sites that will be equally 'gauche and shallow'

 

26.08.2009, 00:02 quote

tzazo
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 289 Location: United Kingdom, England, Dorset
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Considering the behavour I've observed, I would conclude that there are some deeply nasty women out there who happen to be very good looking. In fact I have a nasty suspicion some are nasty and unpleasent to people precisely because they are good looking, and know they can use that to get away with such behaviour.

Now would I want to sleep with them anyway?....
No the cost is too great to my self esteem.

Now there are some very nice women I've met who are..well not exactly startlingly good looking to say the least. But who are very kind and very aggreeable people to meet and work with.

Occaisionaly I meet a nice women who is good looking....and they are usualy happily married with kids.

 

26.08.2009, 08:51 quote

jeggae
jeggae Joined: 07 Dec 2008 Posts: 2157 Location: United Kingdom, England, Bedfordshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

mirrorpool wrote:
eccles wrote:
I personally look for nice eyes and smile first! just because someone is a piece of eyecandy doesn't mean to say that they don't have unpleasant traits, It's why i can't understand why peeps on dating sites are so gauche and shallow!


Dating sites are just a sample of all that there is and so there'll be a sample from non-dating sites that will be equally 'gauche and shallow'


Not sure they are Sue.
With the vast majority of women I've known on the net, pics are the most important thing and NOT personality, and the pics dont have to be that good a likeness of the person.

First impressions are important so maybe men should think about putting on an old good pic of themselves first off to get a bit of interest, or even an arty farty one, women seem to like them..even if its not really a good up to date likeness.


As for personality, women on the net like cheeky and jokey types, maybe a little bad. Not average men with just good personalities.

If they can combine a good pic with a cheeky personality, they probably have it made...especially where forums are concerned.

Average men, with good average pics and good average personalities, dont always get a lot of a lookin.

But the problems comes when met in real life...who will be able to match up to or surpass their online persona's??

This is all from my experiences anyway, having average pics and an average personality and little interest [none] of wanting to be met.
Seems some women on the net dont really want honesty in my experience.

 

26.08.2009, 09:33 quote

70

I meant that in the real world there are probably just as many people who will still be judging by looks alone.

I think I've said before in other threads, MR.Average, normal, usual etc... just doesn't 'rock my boat' and tends to put me off, BUT that doesn't mean I want a 'bad boy' type either I just like quirky and different as they're more likely to understand me and the way I am too.

However, most of my female single friends ARE looking for the normal, average Mr.Nice guy AND TRULY ARE NOT GOING FOR THE GOOD LOOKING HUNKY GUYS

I KNOW they're also not put off by some extra weight, in fact most prefer that to thin guys BUT the most difficult quality most of them have in finding in a guy is the ACCEPTANCE OF THEIR EXISTING FRIENDSHIPS IF ANY OF THEM ARE MALE!

As people get older there's been more years to form good lasting friendships of either love and yes, some men don't even like their partners to have same love friends either.

 

26.08.2009, 11:18 quote

jeggae
jeggae Joined: 07 Dec 2008 Posts: 2157 Location: United Kingdom, England, Bedfordshire
View user's profile Visit poster's website

mirrorpool wrote:
I meant that in the real world there are probably just as many people who will still be judging by looks alone.


So there probably should be Sue, its probably more understandable if there were more, if not always good. But 'Looks' in real life are probably more multidimensional then the 2 dimensions of the net, and more is taken into account. The real world is 'real'. Very Happy

What puzzles me is when women like a personality on the net, then discard when they see the pic. Which is what happened to me on the two forums I go on. For dating and friendship.

Puzzles me when women know they shouldn't put a lot of relevance or trust in pics on the net, but often do.

Also I think some women are influenced by the amount of messages they get, and who they are from..and the fact some men on the net are sycophantic . Also the 2-3 men to every women might give some women disillusions of grandeur Surprised

mirrorpool wrote:

I think I've said before in other threads, MR.Average, normal, usual etc... just doesn't 'rock my boat' and tends to put me off, BUT that doesn't mean I want a 'bad boy' type either I just like quirky and different as they're more likely to understand me and the way I am too.


I can understand you holding out for the kind of man you want. But can I ask you Sue..does this coincide with the men you attract in real life? Do you think you have more of a chance of finding a man like that on the net then real life?

mirrorpool wrote:

However, most of my female single friends ARE looking for the normal, average Mr.Nice guy AND TRULY ARE NOT GOING FOR THE GOOD LOOKING HUNKY GUYS
I KNOW they're also not put off by some extra weight, in fact most prefer that to thin guys


Real life or on the net?

mirrorpool wrote:

As people get older there's been more years to form good lasting friendships of either love and yes, some men don't even like their partners to have same love friends either.


Probably true, but that kind of jealousy happens with both sexes.

 

26.08.2009, 12:17 quote

70

Actually Jegs I think a lot of things we've mentioned are the same for guys looking for women as well.

I know I've also been rejected by men quite a bit when they see my picture too, the 'you're not my type' comes to mind, and that's even been 'for friendship' where I wouldn't have thought that was an issue...... so long as the mode of dress didn't get you banned from places you wanted to go to, but looks for friendship? that just shows an insincere motive I guess.

I KNOW I can't trust the web pics either, but seeing somebody on cam is better, as you can see the body language when you're talking to them.

I agree with you about people being influenced by the amount of messages and flattery they get on the web although I tend to be very suspicious if it's 'over the top' but have learned to accept compliments graciously Very Happy in the same way that I may dish them out too.

As for the type of man I attract on the web or in real life, I don't really think there's much difference when I'm in London, but where I live now in Norfolk there is.
I don't lead the kind of life that has the same opportunities to meet men as I did in London. My social group here is mainly females already in relationships, so I know their men, but we're not out and about in places 'on the pull'. I get the odd guy join me on a seat about town or delivery man asking me out, but I've not fancied any of them enough to accept.
I wished I'd come onto dating sites like this when I lived in London as most men attracted to me now and whom I like too, tend to be living in London, followed by Dublin, Glasgow and Manchester... all the big cities it seems.
I've definitely found it easier in Norfolk to arrange dates with people from the net rather than coming across somebody in real life. It's not just about having the dates, it's about finding someone that intrigues me and has enough about them to sustain my interest in wanting to know them more deeply.
The net is good for 'minds' as people often find it easier to express their thoughts and feelings in writing so I think you can get to know someone more intimately before you meet than a 'real world' date.

 

26.08.2009, 14:54 quote

aydinh
Joined: 02 Aug 2009 Posts: 58 Location: United Kingdom, England, Cornwall
View user's profile Visit poster's website

Apparently it's whats on the inside that counts, but I don't think that a relationship can be formed successful if it is not built on some basis of physical attraction. Of course looks aren't all that counts, but I think it's fairly hard to disagree that they aren't important in today's society.

I actually wish it wasn't the case to be perfectly honest. If you think about it, there would be a wider array of possible matches for most people and you wouldn't get this elitism and bitchiness that comes with high self-esteem. If personality was all that matters then people wouldn't act the way they do or treat people the way they do when searching for a potential partner.

For instance, 90% of the women on this site will not even reply to the majority of messages, even if they are coming from someone who is probably on par with their league, simply because they expect something special. It's like there is a magical code that will let you pull every time but if you don't say that thing exactly correctly then you will be judged quickly and indefinitely based on that first impression. Usually this sort of attitude originates from the inevitable, cocky, high self-esteem that is often accompanied by high levels of attraction.

 

26.08.2009, 14:55 quote

justmejim70

eccles wrote:
I personally look for nice eyes and smile first! just because someone is a piece of eyecandy doesn't mean to say that they don't have unpleasant traits, It's why i can't understand why peeps on dating sites are so gauche and shallow!


Those types are pretty easy to spot though due to the fact that their heads are rammed so far up their own arse they will never get it out.

As for who i'd personally go for, ..that depends on how many pints ive had Laughing

 

26.08.2009, 15:05 quote

70

The biggest problem is THAT SPARK even if you've fancied someone in every other way, is it there or not when you finally meet for real?

 

26.08.2009, 15:47 quote

hiddenxlust

You have to be somewhat attracted to a person on looks alone...I'm not saying looks are everything though.

Personality is more likely to 'wow' me than looks.

 

26.08.2009, 16:03 quote

joey2cards

aydinh wrote:


For instance, 90% of the women on this site will not even reply to the majority of messages, even if they are coming from someone who is probably on par with their league, simply because they expect something special.


Most of the women on this site get so many messages they'd never get a chance to reply to the majority of them.

If a girl doesn't reply to my message, it's not necessarily because her self-esteem is through the roof, it's just because she's had more appealing offers. Maybe there's a particular guy she's into, so she doesn't want to meet new people at that point. It's not an issue worth thinking about.

I make a point of replying to EVERYONE who writes to me, but then I'm a guy so I don't get nearly as many messages as the average girl. If I did get so many messages, I'd probably ignore a few too.

On a more relevant note, of course looks are important... otherwise you'd just be friends. If I'm not attracted to either the girl's looks OR attitude, one or the other, if I find one of these two lacking, I couldn't possibly think of her in a sexual way.

 
 
Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum