What are you running?

Let's see if this works first

Bitte klappe mal weil ich es nicht nochmal versuchen moechte

The buttons missing or something?

200 peeks and three votes?

Damn. You would think if i was asking you or sex on the first date by this response or lack thereof.

I can't see a button to 'vote'.
My son built my computer for me about 4 years ago, and I seem to recall got an AMD something or other.

Intel. But cant do the poll thing, its not showing up for me, sorry.
_________________

leave it to an engineer to screw things up......
it should somewhere around the 60/40 mark favoring intel

intel is more of multi core processors mostly being stable and built with good quality and most amd users get a single core and over clock it's bus. and you need to sign in to vote if you havent figured that out? duh

Doh to u too, I am always signed in, thank for info..........NOT
_________________

Well im not a duh!! I know and have voted but im keeping it a secret cos I can

Im an AMD faithful, but they are just being battered left right and centre by Intel. They recently launched a true quad core cpu which was still based on the K7 architecture and it just doesn't cut the mustard

Intel have the market by the short and curlies atm, and come next month when i get my bonus ill be getting rid of my FX-60 in favour of a nice shiny Q9550 mmmmm i can already feel the speed lol
_________________
Please read the forum guidelines before you post

i have always owned AMD, i think intel are overpriced, they were last time i looked, but that wasnt recently

An AMD Athlon here... it's a.. er.. XP2200 or something, about 1.8GHz if I remember rightly. It's getting on a bit now, had it about four years. Since buying it I've upgraded the graphics, bought a bigger hard drive etc.. it still does what I want, so I'll use it until it blows up before getting another.

Personally Ill go intel,but if you want something dirt cheap that will do the job there's nothing wrong with AMD it does what its supposed to.

Intel However is faster has ALOT more overclocking headroom (ex my Q6600 runs at 3.4ghz per core instead of 2.4) now if your willing to spend more on good ram, a more expensive motherboard(ex. P35 chipset) and slightly more on CPU, for overclocking , intel wins hands down the smallest E2140 outperforms amds 6000+ once overclocked hands down ,its as simple as that.

Aslo at stock speeds amd phenom on most applications still loses to a Q6600 and a Q6600 doesn't require a more expensive mother board(amd needs am2+) to get to its full performance it will work on any newer LGA 775 motherboard.

heres an interesting one for all you that think intel are better...

i am currently running a 3.2 gig intel processor, 2 gig ddr400 + a 512agp gfx card... on a benchmark program my old system kicked it's ass...

my old system was an AMD xp2600 with the same 2 gig ddr400 and 512agp gfx card...

if intel are so wonderfull, how come a 5yr old chip still kicks it's ass...

intel are better for multi-tasking, basicly office related pc's.. if you want performance, amd in the answer.
_________________

Myspace clicky

Facebook Clicky

Depends on the program and depends on what graphics card your running

Lats say your using 3d mark to test your pcs your old pc had a ATI X800 agp 512MB gfx card and your new pc has a Geforce 8400gs 512mb the old one will get a better score

Other things also matter like what version of the softwere your using(3d mark 2003 will give a far better score than 3dmark 06 ) to compare to what OS are you running ect...
_________________
"When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. " - Mae West